User talk:Vergth

Welcome!

Hello, Vergth!

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips

Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Sign your messages with four tildes (~~~~), be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, Doug Weller talk 17:36, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, may God protect you from all bad and evil Vergth (talk) 19:04, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ا

ت Vergth (talk) 14:05, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ف

ف Vergth (talk) 14:05, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Important Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in the Arab–Israeli conflict. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 17:37, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Doug This is not just there never many of the lies and a lot of bias in an article war of attrition and the Yom Kippur War and a massive lie in a war essay for six days Vergth (talk) 18:01, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Irrelevant. Doug Weller talk 15:04, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You mean 300 lies that are not really intentional, but rather they are completely intentional Vergth (talk) 15:13, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note below that talk page edits are covered by the discretionary sanctions. You can use them to discuss the article, not the subject of the article, and must be WP:CIVIL and show good faith. Doug Weller talk 15:22, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Believe me, I offered to verify what I say with sources from books, verify them and verify their truth

Vergth (talk) 15:37, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I brought it up in discussions really, really seriously Vergth (talk) 15:39, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Brother Doug, thank you very much Vergth (talk) 15:50, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Brother Doug, I really don't want to embarrass him. It was an entirely intentional lie. There is no source. I wrote like this without any source, but I don't want to embarrass him, but Egypt should take its right Vergth (talk) 10:42, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing has been changed even because as if I didn't do anything even the commando's claim hasn't been changed that's unfair this is frustrating Vergth (talk) 10:05, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You must follow these page-specific restrictions until you have 500 edits and have been here 30 days

For the purposes of editing restrictions in the ARBPIA topic area, the "area of conflict" shall be defined as encompassing

the entire set of articles whose topic relates to the Arab-Israeli conflict, broadly interpreted ("primary articles"), and
edits relating to the Arab-Israeli conflict, to pages and discussions in all namespaces with the exception of userspace ("related content")

Also,

500/30 Rule: All IP editors, users with fewer than 500 edits, and users with less than 30 days' tenure are prohibited from editing content within the area of conflict. On primary articles, this prohibition is preferably to be enforced by use of extended confirmed protection (ECP) but this is not mandatory. On pages with related content, or on primary articles where ECP is not feasible, the 500/30 Rule may be enforced by other methods, including page protection, reverts, blocks, the use of pending changes, and appropriate edit filters. Reverts made solely to enforce the 500/30 Rule are not considered edit warring.

The sole exceptions to this prohibition are:

1. Editors who are not eligible to be extended-confirmed may use the Talk: namespace to post constructive comments and make edit requests related to articles within the topic area, provided they are not disruptive. Talk pages where disruption occurs may be managed by any of the methods noted in paragraph b). This exception does not apply to other internal project discussions such as AfDs, WikiProjects, RfCs, noticeboard discussions, etc.

2. Editors who are not eligible to be extended-confirmed may not create new articles, but administrators may exercise discretion when deciding how to enforce this remedy on article creations. Deletion of new articles created by editors who do not meet the criteria is permitted but not required.

3. One Revert Restriction (1RR): Each editor is limited to one revert per page per 24 hours on any edits made to content within the area of conflict. Reverts made to enforce the 500/30 Rule are exempt from the provisions of this motion. Also, the normal exemptions apply. Editors who violate this restriction may be blocked by any uninvolved administrator.

Note that this means your edits on such pages (which you aren't yet eligible to make) may be reverted by anyone at any time. These restrictions are stricter than those in most other areas because of the problems that we've had in this area. Doug Weller talk 15:20, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, yes, thank you, dear brother, thank you for the clarification Vergth (talk) 15:26, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Rest assured, in the discussion section, I try to list it with its sources to be sure Vergth (talk) 15:28, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

https://zionism-israel.com/dic/Shayetet_13.htm

Vergth (talk) 16:58, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

My dear brother, please correct this because it is a big and deliberate lie Vergth (talk) 17:00, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I sent you a report on the history of Shatit 13 from the Israeli encyclopedia Vergth (talk) 17:01, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

In addition to Benny Morris' book, Righteous Victims Vergth (talk) 17:04, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Also, in the losses section, there are huge exaggerations in the Yom Kippur war, and the article in general is not balanced Vergth (talk) 10:46, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Brother Doug, I did my best, and you made it very clear how big the biases are in the War of Attrition and October War article and the Big Lie in the Six Day War article. Vergth (talk) 21:08, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Brother Doug, I wish someone would change that lie in the Six Day War article Vergth (talk) 16:55, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I sent two reports on the successes of the Navy and the Army in general Vergth (talk) 16:55, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Brother Doug, may God protect you, dear brother, dear man, may God protect you Vergth (talk) 21:53, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

May God protect you from all bad and evil Vergth (talk) 21:54, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Page block

Per Doug Weller's post above, you were allowed to use the page Talk:Yom Kippur War to post constructive comments and make edit requests related to Yom Kippur War, provided they were not disruptive. The way you have been spamming that talkpage is highly disruptive, however. I note that you didn't slow down any after Doug Weller's warning above; the opposite, if anything. The talkpage has in practice become unusable for the discussions it's intended for. You have therefore been blocked indefinitely from Talk:Yom Kippur War. Note that you can freely edit the rest of Wikipedia; however, if the kind of bludgeoning you've been doing to that page moves elsewhere, you're likely to be either topic banned from the entire Israel-Palestine area, or blocked from the entire site. You can request unblock from an uninvolved administrator by placing {{unblock|your reason here}} on this page. Bishonen | tålk 21:02, 13 September 2022 (UTC).[reply]

My brother, I have listed many sources, including the Israeli intelligence officer, Eli Dekel Vergth (talk) 22:04, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I admit it's annoying, I noticed it late Vergth (talk) 22:06, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

But you should know that what I mean is not intentional annoyance at all. It may seem annoying, but not intentionally Vergth (talk) 22:07, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

But there is a very, very big bias Vergth (talk) 22:13, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, thank you, I will ask for the ban to be lifted Vergth (talk) 22:18, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding the discussions of the 1973 war, I admit that the way it was discussed was annoying and sorry Vergth (talk) 22:43, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am very sorry. Once again, I just want the facts to be highlighted and to be impartial and not huge and unrealistic bias. Thank you Vergth (talk) 22:46, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

And I promise to write it more appropriately Vergth (talk) 22:50, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

unblock

{{unblock|reason=Your reason here [[User:Vergth|Vergth]] ([[User talk:Vergth#top|talk]]) 22:40, 13 September 2022 (UTC)}}

I have disabled the two templates above (one in the heading and one in the comment. Do not put templates in a heading. I also removed your signature from the heading. A signature goes after a comment, not in a heading. Obviously you are supposed to replace "Your reason here" with something meaningful. Warning: You are making far too many comments and you will be blocked if you continue to use talk pages as a sandbox to update thoughts. You need to work out what you want to say, then say it. Johnuniq (talk) 04:55, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. Thank you, John. You used my own user talkpage in the same way, Vergth, taking six edits to post an apology there. That's not good. It means the person on whose page you post gets pinged six times. So on user talkpages, it's, if possible, even more important to "work out what you want to say, then say it". By the way, please stop calling people "brother". I understand that you do it in kindness, but not everybody here is male.

I accept your apology, but I will not lift the page block; another admin may freely do so, if they wish. Bishonen | tålk 07:34, 14 September 2022 (UTC).[reply]

Sorry everyone, sorry for the inconvenience, and I promise to follow the rules and instructions Thank you for your valuable advice

I promise you the change and I hope the ban on me in discussions will be lifted Vergth (talk) 12:16, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have only been blocked from the single page Talk:Yom Kippur War. Not from discussions in general. Bishonen | tålk 12:37, 14 September 2022 (UTC).[reply]

Thank you, I hope to lift the ban on this page as well Vergth (talk) 13:07, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I hope the one-page ban is lifted Vergth (talk) 18:32, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have a question. I have a lot of reliable Egyptian sources, Russian sources and Israeli sources. Is it possible to include them for you and make a positive change in terms of neutrality in the articles? Vergth (talk) 18:34, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You need a link to an article and a specific proposal to add or remove text for that article. Do not post a proposal here. Instead, put it on the article's talk page. If you have a generic question you could ask at WP:Teahouse. Johnuniq (talk) 03:04, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you dear brother. In fact, there are many sources relating exclusively to the War of Attrition and the October War. There is Eli Dekel, an Israeli intelligence officer and participant in the War of Attrition and the October War. and Shulimo Guetta, historian of the naval conflict in the War of Attrition and the Yom Kippur War, there are plenty of Egyptian-Russian sources Vergth (talk) 05:15, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

https://www.dekelegypt.co.il/100515 Vergth (talk) 05:18, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is a source from Elie Dekel, a former Israeli intelligence officer, head of field intelligence during the Yom Kippur War Vergth (talk) 05:18, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

And there are many more Vergth (talk) 05:19, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I wish from the bottom of my heart that my ban from discussions on the Yom Kippur War page will be lifted Vergth (talk) 05:20, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

People wish things all the time. That is not relevant at Wikipedia. Instead, contributors need to demonstrate competence in editing and collaboration. People who cannot or will not engage with other editors are removed (indefinitely blocked). For example, you made five edits to add five comments above since my last post. I do not see any acknowledgment of previous comments such as 'You need to work out what you want to say, then say it' and 'a link to an article and a specific proposal to add or remove text for that article' and 'please stop calling people "brother"'. Johnuniq (talk) 06:31, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok please I hope the one page ban is unblocked Vergth (talk) 14:51, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding the discussions, in fact, I will only make effective suggestions, and I will rewrite some comments in the discussions more appropriately, namely the last two Vergth (talk) 15:00, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I acknowledge previous comments from you. I understand your position Vergth (talk) 16:47, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I would suggest deleting the claim that an Egyptian minesweeper was sunk before the commandos were captured in Alexandria in Egypt. Vergth (talk) 22:31, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

First, he said that the Israeli source referred to the sinking of the naval vessels. I researched the article on the Six Day War. There is no source for what he referred to. I wrote like this without any source. There is no source for this claim in the Six Day War article

Vergth (talk) 22:38, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not even in Israeli sources such as the Israeli Encyclopedia Vergth (talk) 22:45, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

https://zionism-israel.com/dic/Shayetet_13.htm Vergth (talk) 22:47, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sabotage Israeli divers were sent to the ports of Port Said and Alexandria, but they failed to damage a single ship. Six Israeli divers were captured in Alexandria and captured page 784 in Benny Morris' book The Righteous Victims Vergth (talk) 22:53, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That is why I suggest deleting it, by the way, there is no source that refers to this claim at all in the Six Day War article. That is why I suggest going to the article and you will see that it is an absolutely unrealistic claim. Vergth (talk) 22:56, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There are also a lot of incomprehensible things in the Navy. There is an exaggeration in the article of the Israeli naval commandos. They do not write the facts in the same way as the encyclopedia, although it is based on the same encyclopedia, but there is fabrication and illusory exaggeration Vergth (talk) 23:04, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shayetet_13

Vergth (talk) 23:09, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is the article of the Israeli naval commandos that they rely on the encyclopedia for the , but they did not write it in the same format as the encyclopedia, but rather they make up illusions

Vergth (talk) 23:15, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please compare what was written in the encyclopedia and what was written in the article, despite their reliance on the encyclopedia itself as a source, and you will see the extent of bias Vergth (talk) 23:20, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is painful and this is only the tip of the iceberg Vergth (talk) 23:23, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a response? Vergth (talk) 15:25, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You can request unblock from an uninvolved administrator — not me or Johnuniq — by placing {{unblock|your reason here}} on this page. Do it below, and replace the phrase "your reason here" with your actual reason for requesting unblock. Read the guide to appealing blocks first, to make sure your request helps your case. And please avoid posting it in many little bits; posting once is best, especially for this. Bishonen | tålk 19:38, 16 September 2022 (UTC).[reply]

Thank you so much Vergth (talk) 20:31, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Vergth (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

My ban on the Yom Kippur War discussion page is no longer necessary, and I fully understand the editors' position, and I promise to rewrite the last two comments in a more appropriate manner. Vergth (talk) 21:02, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

I will give you a chance to show you can contribute to the discussion without disruption. I will advise you that the block may be reimposed should disruption continue. 331dot (talk) 07:58, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Vergth, I'm assuming that your comment just above the unblock request templates was your actual reason for why you think you should be unblocked. I've moved it into the template for you (and removed the second template — only one is wanted). I hope I understood your intention correctly. Now all you have to do is wait for an uninvolved admin to come to the page. Bishonen | tålk 21:20, 16 September 2022 (UTC).[reply]

Thank you very much for your help. Thank you very much Deep respect and appreciation Vergth (talk) 21:26, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ANI Notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.75.27.153.239 (talk) 17:01, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for informing me, my dear brother Vergth (talk) 02:14, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]