User talk:Vidboy10

AfD nomination of Expo 2011

I have nominated Expo 2011, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Expo 2011. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. єmarsee • Speak up! 02:32, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Population

Please note two things:

Wikipedia uses the exact population figures documented in official Statistics Canada censuses only, not intercensal estimates. That means we can't add "2008" populations, because there's no official documentable source for them.
The population of the City of Vancouver is not the same as the population of Metro Vancouver. The population of the City of Vancouver was correct as written; it's not supposed to include people who live in Surrey or New Westminster or Delta or Langley, because they aren't within the boundaries of the city.

Thanks. Bearcat (talk) 20:23, 6 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of GBATemp

A tag has been placed on GBATemp requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. DanielRigal (talk) 22:12, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Haiti

Greetings. Please refrain from repeating that edit. The template built for such purposes does a better job carrying and categorizing that information. -- Theoprakt (talk) 09:22, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

January 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Doug Walker, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Doug Walker was changed by Vidboy10 (u) (t) redirecting article to non-existant page on 2010-01-21T04:48:33+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 04:48, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of To Be Anounced Nine Inch Nails Album

The article To Be Anounced Nine Inch Nails Album has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:Crystal

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ridernyc (talk) 06:44, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of To Be Anounced Nine Inch Nails Album

I have nominated To Be Anounced Nine Inch Nails Album, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/To Be Anounced Nine Inch Nails Album. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Shadowjams (talk) 07:08, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of photo

This edit[1] is not constructive. Please don't remove content from articles without a valid reason. The simple fact that a photo is "disturbing" is insufficient grounds for removal. ScottyBerg (talk) 20:10, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

February 2011

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on 2011 Egyptian protests. Users who edit disruptively or refuse to collaborate with others may be blocked if they continue.

In particular, the three-revert rule states that:

Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
Editors violating the rule will usually be blocked for 24 hours for a first incident.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes. Work towards wording, and content that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Please take your concerns back to the talk page and try to establish a consensus instead of edit warring Onorem ♠Dil 20:38, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for violating Wikipedia policy. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest this block by replying here on your talk page by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}}. You may also email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list instead, or mail unblock-en-llists.wikimedia.org. Dreadstar ☥ 21:29, 3 February 2011 (UTC) [reply]

Hello, Vidboy10. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia because your username, Vidboy10, does not meet our username policy.

Your username is the only reason for this block. You are welcome to choose a new username (see below).

A username should not be promotional, related to a "real-world" group or organization, misleading, offensive, or disruptive. Also, usernames may not end in the word "bot" unless the account is an approved bot account.

You are encouraged to choose a new account name that meets our policy guidelines. Alternatively, if you have already made edits and you wish to keep your existing contributions under a new name, then you may request a change in username by:

Adding {{unblock-un|your new username here}} on your user talk page. You should be able to do this even though you are blocked, as you can usually still edit your own talk page. If not, you may wish to contact the blocking administrator by clicking on "E-mail this user" on their talk page.
At an administrator's discretion, you may be unblocked for 24 hours to file a request.
Please note that you may only request a name that is not already in use, so please check here for a listing of already taken names. The account is created upon acceptance, thus do not try to create the new account before making the request for a name change. For more information, please see Wikipedia:Changing username.

If you feel that you were blocked in error, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

An editor has expressed a concern that this account may be a sockpuppet of HanzoHattori (talk · contribs · logs).
Please refer to the sockpuppet investigation of the sockpuppeteer, and editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful.

Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth

--86.29.76.94 (talk) 16:32, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. Wipsenade (talk) 16:42, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]