User talk:Videogamemansion

Why are you swapping out cited links for external links on the Vita list page? It looks stupid and seems really pointless.

Welcome!

Hello, Videogamemansion, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Amphibian Man (video game), may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! role^player 18:03, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Amphibian Man (video game)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Amphibian Man (video game) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. role^player 18:03, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of A-men

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on A-men requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. GouramiWatcher ^(Gulp) 18:29, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of A-men

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on A-men, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. "Pepper" @ 19:53, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

April 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from List of PlayStation 3 games. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Ðℬig XЯaɣ 14:26, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Vita connectivity

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia but the Vita Connectivity column uses too much space in an already cramped table and adds too much code for something that affects so few games. The information is not necessary for this table. Please discuss it on the talk page before making further big changes to the article. Thanks. Chimpanzee ^{Us | Ta | Co} 14:30, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Due to the size of the article we have try to reach a consensus on the talk page before adding large amounts of additional information. Please start a discussion there and form a consensus with other editors before re-adding the Vita Connectivity information. If you continue to edit against concensus you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Chimpanzee ^{Us | Ta | Co} 14:56, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Chimpanzee ^{Us | Ta | Co} 14:51, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for your disruption caused by edit warring and violation of the three-revert rule at List of PlayStation 3 games. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. --Chris (talk) 18:33, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Videogamemansion (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

forgot to log out on a public computer and someone used my account Videogamemansion (talk) 12:12, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You do realise that any admin could therefore block this account indefinitely as compromised? Not a very smart way to try and get out of a short block, even more so when the edit-warring fits perfectly with your previous edits. Do you think we're that stupid? Jac16888 ^Talk 13:19, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Speedy deletion nomination of @field

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on @field, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. AndrewWTaylor (talk) 14:19, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 25

Hi. When you recently edited Army Corps of Hell, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Action (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:25, 25 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Broken (video game)

The article Broken (video game) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Per WP:CRYSTAL, Wikipedia is not a collection of product announcements and rumors.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Nat Gertler (talk) 01:21, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Broken (video game)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Broken (video game), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Nat Gertler (talk) 01:22, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your video game articles

Hello. I notice that you've created a few video game reviews as Wikipedia articles. Please stop doing that... Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, which means that we report on what others have said—not what we think as editors (see our no original research and neutral point of view policies). Generally, video game articles would describe the gameplay, plot, reception, etc., as reported by other sources. We do not write our own reviews or pass judgment about games. If you want to write video game reviews, please consider starting your own blog or finding an appropriate alternative outlets. Thanks. wctaiwan (talk) 10:38, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note that I have trimmed a couple of your reviews down to stubs. If you want to reuse the content elsewhere (and you wrote it yourself), it'd still be in the revision history. wctaiwan (talk) 11:05, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of A-men

I have nominated this article for deletion because it is clearly copied from this page. Please do not create articles using content from other websites, as it would be copyright infringement and illegal.

Please, slow down and take some time to understand what is and isn't expected of content on Wikipedia—neutral overviews on notable topics are good, opinionated reviews and plagiarism are not. If you are confused and trying to do the right thing but don't know if something is okay, feel free to ask me on my talk page. I'll try to help where I can. wctaiwan (talk) 10:42, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of New Little King's Story and Madagascar 3: The Videogame

I have nominated these two articles for deletion because they're clearly copied from elsewhere. Please stop copying content from other websites, or you may be blocked from editing. If you need help getting the hang of things, we'd love to try to help, but you need to address issues when asked and start communicating. wctaiwan (talk) 13:20, 5 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of @field (video game) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article @field (video game) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/@field (video game) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 12:37, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:23, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:Videogamemansion/Call of Duty (PS Vita)

User:Videogamemansion/Call of Duty (PS Vita), a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Videogamemansion/Call of Duty (PS Vita) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Videogamemansion/Call of Duty (PS Vita) during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Legacypac (talk) 02:39, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]