User talk:Vlakovod

May you have something to my activities here, pls, let me know. Vlakovod (talk) 09:34, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Cherry picking

You need to look at what newspaper articles say, not just headlines or picture captions. That is A violation of WP:CHERRYPICK and it not a good idea.Slatersteven (talk) 09:35, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank for your advise. Suppose it is concerning the Whitehall case. I'll take care of that. Meanwhile, I tried to search some other sources but haven't found anything relevant yet, but Belfast. I will appreciate any similar advices. Vlakovod (talk) 06:37, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

At this time you appear to very much be a wp:spa. It might be best to cut your teeth on some less controversial topics before wading it at the deep end.Slatersteven (talk) 09:48, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for this advice/opinion but it sounds quite ambiguous. Do you mean that my (basically) not what the sources say is rather promotion, advocacy or other unsuitable agendas than simply an effort to improve the quality (here to build an encyclopedia)? Vlakovod (talk) 08:38, 12 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I mean that you are editing one topic area (practically one page) and have made a few fundamental errors you woulds not have done if maybe you had had a bit more experience under your belt. As it stands if you made a few more of these kinds of errors I doubt you would survive a wp:ani report as you seem to only be interested in one subject.Slatersteven (talk) 10:10, 12 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It might be a good idea to enlarge my scope here. Thanks. Vlakovod (talk) 06:14, 15 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Benjamin Kuras (January 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Turnagra was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Article needs further sourcing, particularly for review quotes (though you may also wish to rewrite these in a more encyclopedic fashion, see "Reception" section on similar articles for ideas on how to do this).

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Benjamin Kuras and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Turnagra (talk) 00:33, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Vlakovod! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Turnagra (talk) 00:33, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Benjamin Kuras has been accepted

Benjamin Kuras, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 10:26, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]