User talk:Vrahomarinaner

June 2016

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Greek Super Cup has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Greek Super Cup was changed by Vrahomarinaner (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.884116 on 2016-06-21T16:51:51+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:51, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits while logged out. Making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow the use of more than one account or IP address per person. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you. Sro23 (talk) 05:13, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sro23. I ask to end the punishment.--Vrahomarinaner (talk) 08:24, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Vrahomarinaner (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Because I am a good boy

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Max Semenik (talk) 10:50, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Max Semenik.I ask to end my blocked because it is unfair.My sources are correct.The user Sro23 to quash me because he swore.But time passed.It is time to return.--Vrahomarinaner (talk) 07:41, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

--Vrahomarinaner (talk) 09:21, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Vrahomarinaner (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

original unblock reason

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yunshui ^雲 _水 09:25, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

My sources are correct--Vrahomarinaner (talk) 07:47, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Talk page access revoked

As this was going nowhere and you faked an unblock accept on this page, your right to edit it has been revoked. You may use WP:UTRS for further appeals, however I have to warn you that if you continue not listening to others, the result will be the same. Max Semenik (talk) 17:09, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]