User talk:WarHawkSP

3RR

Just a friendly reminder that you're at 3 reverts on the Derek Smart article for today. Ehheh 21:00, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Really? I thought it was two. Thanks for the headsup though. WarHawkSP 21:20, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

derek smart

When editing the article, do not remove sourced material. Unsourced material may be removed per WP:V, but removal of sourced material is frowned upon and may violate wikipedia policy. I refer specifically to the daily victim references that you removed. ⇒ SWATJester ^Ready Aim _Fire! 06:32, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked for 12 hours

For a 3 revert rule violation on Derek Smart. Please be careful with reverts. Thanks. --Woohookitty^(meow) 12:59, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked again for continued edit warring. -- Steel 13:26, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

talk page removal

Please do not remove other people's comments from talk pages. In addition, please do not confuse talk page discussion with violations of WP:BLP and accuse others of vandalism, that is not in good faith. In general, the only reason to remove another person's talk page comments is to remove direct personal attacks against another editor, and even that is not policy, merely a guideline. ⇒ SWATJester ^{On Belay!} 01:49, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

He wasnt offering an opinion. He is doing exactly what he did on Usenet by accusing Smart of academic fraud. How can you NOT see that. Also, according to policy, such material CAN be removed from talk pages. You might want to read this, which is what am going by. Look, this guy is bad news. He has no business on this Wiki other than to taint it and inject his rhetoric on others.

I am also going by the tag at the very top of the talk page which CLEARLY states thus

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material of any kind that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libelous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

Anyway, I sent Smart an email earlier this week and this morning he tells me that he is going to contact Jimbo Wales directly, since there are strict rules which allow pages about people to contact them if there are such issues of libel. WarHawkSP 12:39, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Incivility

It seems to me that you are acting in an uncivil manner. Please remain civil and don't resort to making personal attacks or instigating edit wars. (note, this template refers to your accusations against me on BLP Notice board. You need to remain civil and learn to follow the rules of behavior. Even if you were right in your arguments, you'd be violating policy with incivil accusations and personal attacks.) ⇒ SWATJester ^{On Belay!} 09:18, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Duly noted; but I wasn't being uncivil nor was it my intent. Sorry. WarHawkSP 17:44, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

BLP discussion

Your edit removed Kerr Avon's comment. - (Nuggetboy) (talk) (contribs) 21:17, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It was intentional. Please read the guidelines for editing on the notice board. If he has a comment to make, he can make it in a SEPARATE section instead of embedding it inside my section. WarHawkSP 00:53, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Request for Arbitration filed on Derek Smart

Hello,

A request for arbitration has been filed on the article Derek Smart, which you have been involved with in some manner. If you would like to contribute to the request, or subsequent case if accepted, please visit WP:RFAR. ⇒ SWATJester ^{On Belay!} 03:38, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Derek Smart

Hello,

An Arbitration case involving you has been opened: Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Derek Smart. Please add any evidence you may wish the arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Derek Smart/Evidence. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Derek Smart/Workshop.

On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, Thatcher131 23:23, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Derek Smart

An arbitration case in which you were involved, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Derek Smart, has closed. For a period of six months, no single-purpose account may revert any edit made to the Derek Smart article. This article is referred to the Wikipedia editing community for clean-up, evaluation of sources, and adherence to NPOV. Any user may fully apply the principles of Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons to this article. Supreme Cmdr is banned from Wikipedia for one year. Supreme Cmdr and other surrogates of Derek Smart are also banned from editing Derek Smart, but may edit the talkpage. This is a summary of the remedy provisions of the decision, and editors should review the complete text of the decision before taking any action. This notice is given by a Clerk on behalf of the Arbitration Committee. Newyorkbrad 23:40, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]