User talk:WaynaQhapaq

Welcome!

Hello, WaynaQhapaq, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus ^Talk 01:52, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Freemasonry

The talk page was too long, why did you go and revert the archiving? Ardenn 19:55, 17 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, I'm not sure what you are referring to. I did make an edit to the talk page, but i didn't revert any of the archiving. Please explainwhat you mean. Thanks. WaynaQhapaq 20:01, 17 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If you look at your last edit it looks like you just reinserted material that had just been added to the archive. Ardenn 20:02, 17 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think there is a misunderstanding here. While I was editing, an edit conflict occured. I simply inserted the most current form of the talk page with my recently added comment at the bottom so as to complete the edit and resolve the conflict. I did not make any changes regarding the archiving. Perhaps it is possible that somehow this process inadvertently caused the archiving to be changed, but I assure you that it was not my intention to do so. WaynaQhapaq 20:13, 17 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, okay. Glad it got cleared up and that you got your edits made. :-) BTW welcome. Ardenn 20:21, 17 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I partially reverted your edit because you had removed the semi-protected tag. Ardenn 21:54, 17 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"reverting unwarranted removal of tags"

Speaking of, I would point out that your removal (twice) of the semi-protect on Freemasonry here and here is the same thing you complain about in the latter diff about removal of tags. Once is a mistake, twice is on purpose. You are not an administrator; therefore you cannot remove a semi-protect, even though you can edit the page. The template clearly states that semi-protects cannot be removed unless removal has been requested, and it was not. Please do not remove it again. MSJapan 22:25, 17 May 2006 (UTC).[reply]

On the Contrary, as much as you might attempt to make an issue out of this my removal of the semi protect tag was indeed unintentional, In good faith I shall assume that your removal of the neutrality dispute and citation of sources tag was unintentional as well. Please don't try to prove me wrong by removing them again. Thank you. WaynaQhapaq 22:33, 17 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"reverting unwarranted removal of tags"

removing will not allow you to put that information back online. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.255.131.11 (talk) 20:53, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Balsa (Ship) needs to be revised and cleaned up to meet Wikipedia's quality standards. Mhzfutbol5 01:58, 20 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My Revert

Let me take a look at my revert. It could have been a mistake on my part, or it could have appeared to be a test edit. I don't know yet. I will leave you another message soon. Happy editing:)--SJP 19:36, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It was my fault. I was not careful enough. Thanks for bringing it up though:) Though I do not make mistakes too much, I still sometimes do. Cheers!--SJP 19:39, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for clearing this up. Good luck with your future edits :)

WaynaQhapaq 19:42, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Totora titicaca.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Totora titicaca.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 20:19, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]