User talk:Werner Zagrebbi

Welcome

Hello, Werner Zagrebbi, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! Doug Weller talk 17:29, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Directories and indexes Department directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Our help forum for new editors, the Teahouse The Help Desk, for more advanced questions Help pages Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

December 2020

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Doug Weller talk 17:29, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

General sanctions relating to Covid

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has enacted a more stringent set of rules. Any administrator may impose sanctions – such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks – on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 17:30, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Woke

I removed a number of the see alsos you added as inappropriate. You could try justifying them on the talk page. Doug Weller talk 12:31, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure this is the correct talk page. Sorry, I am a beginner. I'm not sure what the standards are for adding things to the see also. I thought some of the social science articles I added had interesting parallels to this lexical one, they were talking about similar phenomena with different kinds of language! Is this enough to merit their inclusion? I don't know!

At the top of an article there should be the word talk that you can click. I though panic, etc simply don’t apply. MOS:ALSO is relevant but it can be subjective. See WP:SIGN to learn how to sign your posts. Doug Weller talk 18:17, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Eh, this is too hard. I'll continue my low level contributions without trying to step into the big leagues of the talk page and controversial articles like this again. Thanks for everything you do for this encyclopedia! Werner Zagrebbi (talk) 18:27, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, and thank you for contributing and being so polite! Doug Weller talk 18:42, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

June 2022

Hello, I'm Doug Weller. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Alfredo Stroessner ‎, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. The text you changed was backed by the source, yours was not. We follow the source, not interpret it. Doug Weller talk 12:36, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the info, I'm really a beginner. I thought the "state of siege" wording was unusual, and I substituted for a more common near-synonym. I didn't intend to change the semantics of the article. I'm not sure what the rules are for what names to call things, (its probably just about what is in the sources isn't it, and I didn't look at those!) but I do think the change makes the article read a little more easily. Werner Zagrebbi (talk) 17:58, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Werner Zagrebbi it might, but we have to follow the source. Doug Weller talk 18:12, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

cool Werner Zagrebbi (talk) 18:13, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Richard Hanania (September 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Idoghor Melody were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Richard Hanania and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 13:03, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Werner Zagrebbi! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 13:03, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:49, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Richard Hanania

Hello, Werner Zagrebbi. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Richard Hanania, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:03, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Richard Hanania

Hello, Werner Zagrebbi. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Richard Hanania".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:45, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Richard Hanania (August 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Richard Hanania instead.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft is either essentially the same as the article with the same name, or a subset of the article with the same name. The draft will be replaced by a redirect from draft space to the article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Richard Hanania and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 04:31, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:00, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Stuart J. Ritchie

Hi @Werner Zagrebbi, thanks for adding an image to the Stuart J. Ritchie page. I would like to encourage you, however, to familiarize yourself with proper image placement protocol on Wikipedia, especially when a page has an infobox with an image parameter specifically for this purpose. You have been an editor on Wikipedia since 2020, and this is quite basic knowledge. It is rather sloppy to simply dump an image on a page without taking the time to do so in the proper manner, and it creates unnecessary work for other editors. Cheers! Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 03:00, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Barnstar of Good Humor
	Thank you Mr. Zaggrebi for your outstanding contributions to photography TocMan (talk) 17:09, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Werner Zagrebbi (talk) 22:50, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Progress Studies has been accepted

Progress Studies, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 11:57, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]