User talk:WezSchultz

This is WezSchultz's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

February 2020

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Singtel, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Do make use of <ref></ref> when putting in references. See Help:Referencing_for_beginners for more info robertsky (talk) 09:26, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@WezSchultz: I suggest reading Help:Referencing for beginners closely again before someone else comes in and revert your changes. Also stop marking your major edits as minor. If you are introducing new content into the articles, rule of the thumb is that they are major edits. Marking them as minor make it seems that you are hiding your edits from many other editors are not watching for minor edits on articles in their Watchlists. robertsky (talk) 00:10, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@robertsky: I am sorry for the mistakes I had made. I am new to editing the Wikipedia and therefore unclear of certain rules. I am trying my best to contribute for the wikipedia. Thank you for reminding me. WezSchultz (talk) 04:14, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No worries. Take your time to get familarised with how to edit and contribute for wikipedia. I am dropping in a templatised welcome message, which should point you in the right directions. I suggest you do the tutorial as a start. robertsky (talk) 07:07, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, WezSchultz, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! robertsky (talk) 07:08, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

About inserting content from sources directly

Be careful on how you insert content from your sources. It may flag as possible copyright violations. As you may have noticed, I have been editing your early edits on Singtel. As part of content editing process, I would run a copyright violation check using a tool. For your Gushcloud entry, being a short one, the tool had picked up a possible copyright violation of one of your sources. I would recommend paraphrasing or rearranging the key points while still being supported by the references. robertsky (talk) 14:45, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

March 2020

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Singtel into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Copied text from Singtel to Gushcloud International robertsky (talk) 07:05, 8 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Variety

Hello. In a recent edit, you changed one or more words or styles from one national variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.

For a subject exclusively related to the United Kingdom (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. For something related to another English-speaking country, such as Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Ireland, India, or Pakistan use the variety of English used there. For an international topic, use the form of English that the original author of the article used.

In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to another, even if you don't normally use the version in which the article is written. Respect other people's versions of English. They, in turn, should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Manual of Style. If you have any questions about this, you can ask me on my talk page or visit the help desk. Thank you. Ythlev (talk) 19:22, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chia Wee Boon (August 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KartikeyaS343 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Chia Wee Boon and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Chia Wee Boon, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KartikeyaS (talk) 06:13, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:03, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Feng Huang Shan

Hello, WezSchultz. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Feng Huang Shan".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 03:10, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:53, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Chia Wee Boon

Hello, WezSchultz. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Chia Wee Boon, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:03, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chia Wee Boon (June 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hatchens was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Chia Wee Boon and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Chia Wee Boon, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hatchens (talk) 15:19, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, WezSchultz! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Hatchens (talk) 15:19, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Chia Wee Boon

Hello, WezSchultz. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Chia Wee Boon".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:12, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Goh Kok Keong (Criminal)

Hello, WezSchultz. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Goh Kok Keong (Criminal), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:01, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:List of pro-China individuals

Hello, WezSchultz. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of pro-China individuals, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:01, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:List of pro-China individuals

Hello, WezSchultz. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of pro-China individuals".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:59, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tradenation luxury goods scam for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tradenation luxury goods scam is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tradenation luxury goods scam until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Kingoflettuce (talk) 16:22, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notice on Wikipedia policies

Hello WezSchultz,

Please do take care not to include material about non-public people unless a conviction has been secured per WP:BLPCRIME. Per WP:COATRACK, it's also not advisable to add incidents such as murders at specific locations unless they have had an adverse impact or results in any policy changes. If the incidents are notable, they will have their own page, such as River Valley High School attack. Seloloving (talk) 09:01, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: IPETCA has been accepted

IPETCA, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Schwede 66 17:05, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Pansuk Siriwipa

Hello, WezSchultz. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Pansuk Siriwipa, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:01, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Pansuk Siriwipa

Hello, WezSchultz. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Pansuk Siriwipa".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 12:20, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:JJ Poor To Rich

Hello, WezSchultz. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:JJ Poor To Rich, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:02, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of Chinese Communist Party members for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Chinese Communist Party members is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Chinese Communist Party members until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

SilverStar54 (talk) 17:38, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]