User talk:Why 880611

November 2007

1. Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Green Giant 03:45, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

2. 

   This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
   The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Whatever your personal gripe is, take it somewhere else. Green Giant 03:52, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

Korea

Response to a message left on my talkpage

1. I haven't been watching you.
2. I am not an administrator.
3. "the history of korea is fake one on this website," - the article you vandalised provides it's references be they Korean websites or not. If you have any evidence to the contrary, then the onus is on YOU to provide the references. Don't just tell me to Google for it, present your own reliable sources.
4. Learn some anger management - just because someone reverted your actions you should not respond with hate-filled rhetoric like this. If you continue to do this, you will be blocked from editing on this site.
5. Don't delete messages from your discussion page because it counts as vandalism.
6. Always sign your messages using four tildas like this ~~~~
7. If you have any particular issues you are welcome to contact Wikipedia management using any of the methods on this page.

Green Giant 16:41, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

November 9, 2007

Response to second message left on my talkpage

1. "if your haven't watched me or aren't administrator, how could you notice i vandalized that particular page"
   Every account offers the possibility of "watching pages" so every time it is edited, it lists it on my watchlist.
2. if i upset you with my anger, then i am awfully sorry, because you misunderstand my real personality"
   Apology accepted.
3. "If you have any evidence to the contrary, then the onus is on YOU to provide the references. Don't just tell me to Google for it, present your own reliable sources."
   I wasn't angry when I put the word "YOU" in capitals. It was simply to highlight that it is your responsibility to provide sources and not mine.
4. "it's pretty much out of your duty if you are not administrator, because i create this account, and i think i have right to personlize it if i don't want those worthless information to be left in my message box. on the other hand i haven't learnt it will breach the rules if i wanna delete them"
   You have the freedom to edit your userpage and user talkpage as you see fit. However, deleting messages as you did earlier isn't the best way to deal with this issue. It is not necessary to be an administrator in order to do what I did - look at this page for an explanation of the methods available to all editors to help counter vandalism. As the list of your disruptive edits below shows, I am perfectly justified in reversing your actions and leaving warning messages on your talkpage:

   Edits to Korea -

   1. first "bullshit" comment
   2. second "bullshit" comment
   3. "whore of the American" comment
   4. belittling edit - "the king of the this land beg the name from Chinese Emperor"
   5. deleted entire "Science and technology" section without explanation
   6. deleted entire text of article without explanation
   7. several paragraphs from "Science and technology" section deleted without explanation
   8. hate message and threat of violence added - "i will wipe whole korean race away from earth"

   Edits to South Korea

   1. deleted entire Pre-World War2 history without explanation
   2. deleted post-World War2 history without explanation
   3. deleted remainder of article without explanation

5. "i am a Chinese and i think i knew better than you in the asian history about korea. so i just put the some comments on it, also delete some fake one. and i will send you proof when i have free time after my exam."
   Your ethnicity does not make you an expert on anything. Wikipedia demands reliability and the only way to do that is to provide neutral, third party sources for all controversial information. If you can provide a reliable source of information, then it is perfectly acceptable to modify the article and cite that source. If that proves controversial to anyone and they reverse your actions, then place a question on the talkpage and take it from there.

   Green Giant 16:44, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

   May 2011

   

   Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Korea, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.
   • Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
   • ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
   • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Korea was changed by Why 880611 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.965414 on 2011-05-10T13:44:59+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:45, 10 May 2011 (UTC)

   

   You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Elockid ^(Talk) 23:48, 28 May 2011 (UTC)