User talk:WikiShakeshere

Hello there, it's WikiShakeshere here 😊 Welcome to my talk page!

Article for Creation


Wikipedia ads	file info – #69

WikiShakeshere (talk) 16:05, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi WikiShakeshere! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 16:25, Sunday, February 28, 2021 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, WikiShakeshere! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

If you don't already know, you should sign your posts on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) to insert your username and the date.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! Kichu🐘 ^Discuss 16:20, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deprodding of Draft:Arjyou

Hi WikiShakeshere, welcome to Wikipedia. I've deprodded Draft:Arjyou as the WP:PROD guidelines indicate that PRODs should not be used with drafts. Thanks! DanCherek (talk) 06:06, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thank you for the information WikiShakeshere (talk) 06:08, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, WikiShakeshere, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at the our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

Article development
Standard layout
Lead section
How to write a great article
The perfect article
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions ask me on my talk page or you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Kichu🐘 ^Discuss 16:36, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ramzan Muhammed

The article Ramzan Muhammed has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A dancer turned actor who participated in a reality show. The subject does not have notable roles in any movies. The sources also fails to give SIGCOV hence fails WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kichu🐘 ^Discuss 16:45, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ramzan Muhammed for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ramzan Muhammed is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ramzan Muhammed until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Kichu🐘 ^Discuss 03:19, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Deepa Nisanth

Hello, WikiShakeshere,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Padavalamkuttanpilla and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I have tagged an article that you started, Deepa Nisanth, for deletion, because [consensus decision] previously decided that it wasn't suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. If you wish to restore a page deleted via a deletion discussion, please use the deletion review process instead, rather than reposting the content of the page.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Padavalamkuttanpilla}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Padavalam🌂 ► 06:53, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

March 2021

Hello WikiShakeshere. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:WikiShakeshere. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=WikiShakeshere|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. GSS ^💬 08:02, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

what are you saying dude? I don't have any financial benefits from anyone. WikiShakeshere (talk) 08:05, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

What is your relationship with the people you are writing about? GSS ^💬 08:07, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I don't have any relationship with the people that I'm writing about. Ramzan Muhammed is a contestant in Bigg Boss (Malayalam season 3) and Deepa Nisanth is a very notable writer and she is working as an assistant professor in Sree Kerala Varma College, Thrissur. WikiShakeshere (talk) 08:12, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Then how you own copyrights of these images you uploaded on commons-wiki as your own work? GSS ^💬 08:14, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Edited Exif data WikiShakeshere (talk) 08:17, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

GSS, I also doubted this user at first for paid editing. But I dont think he is as per current scenario. The persons for which he created the articles are quite popular in Kerala. But Ramzan Muhammed is not notable as per our guidelines here. And Deepa Nishanth has been covered in multie sources. Thats why I removed the tag in the first place itself. Anyway I will strictly watching this user, because the two articles under work by him, currently in draftspace may not be notable. Regards Kichu🐘 ^Discuss 08:25, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WikiShakeshere This doesn't answer any of the questions. How is it that you are the owner of this image in particular? The exif data is irrelevant and assuming you did indeed take it, how is it that you happened to take professional photos of multiple subjects you've created articles about? These aren't candid "I saw them out in public/at x event!" photos. CUPIDICAE💕 12:38, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. GSS ^💬 08:26, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Deb. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.
Hello, WikiShakeshere. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you.Deb (talk) 09:37, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Deepa Nisanth (March 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Padavalamkuttanpilla was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

All sources only explain the controversy. more reliable source is needed

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Deepa Nisanth and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Deepa Nisanth, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Padavalam🌂 ► 12:14, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, WikiShakeshere! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Padavalam🌂 ► 12:14, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Deepa Nisanth

Hello, WikiShakeshere. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Deepa Nisanth, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:02, 7 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Deepa Nisanth

Hello, WikiShakeshere. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Deepa Nisanth".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:29, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]