User talk:Wikibaji

Welcome!

Hello, Wikibaji, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! --92.40.141.137 (talk) 07:10, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks 92.40.141.137 for your message.

Wikibaji (talk) 07:16, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Prasanth Manghat (February 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Not convincing given the sources are only simple announcements, simply "helped get it in LSE" is not a significant claim for notability itself, there's no automatic inherited from anything or anyone.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Prasanth Manghat and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 08:28, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Samaira Sandhu, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Tamil and Telugu. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:55, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You User:DPL bot, I fixed Tamil & Telugu as languages on Samaira Sandhu article.

Wikibaji (talk) 12:08, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

hello wikibaji

hello wikibaji — Preceding unsigned comment added by Guddatyagi01 (talk • contribs) 05:57, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes User:Guddatyagi01, how may i help? Wikibaji (talk) 10:47, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Prasanth Manghat has been accepted

Prasanth Manghat, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SwisterTwister talk 20:46, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Badarpur, Budaun has been accepted

Badarpur, Budaun, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SwisterTwister talk 22:57, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Prasanth Manghat

Hi there, Please stop vandalizing the articles and stocking Wikipedia. I am trying to add more information on article Prasanth Manghat by citing reliable sources.

The present article Prasanth Manghat is not written in neutral point of view. AS per Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Biographies, Wikipedia does not allow to add Mr. & Ms. to the name of subject as you have mentioned.

The present article has only two categories, more suitable categories can be added related to the article as per Wikipedia:Categorization. Apart from this, 24% of the article content is copied which violates Wikipedia:Copyright violations. Without reviewing properly reverting all the edits is insane and against the policy. You should know that any content which is not verifiable is called promotional in nature. What I had edited was supported with reliable sources.

I am trying to neutralize the article as per Wikipedia policy and adding more information about Manghat. I request you to do not to stock and vandalize the article by reverting my edits repeatedly. Otherwise I have to raise the issue to the Help Desk. If you have any objection, you can leave your message at Talk:Prasanth Manghat page, before reverting anything. Let the other editors and administrators decide, whither it's promotional or it's not. Thank You. --103.51.134.25 (talk) 07:43, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Promotional content. It seems a close connection with the subject, Caught contributing on NMC Health. Wikibaji (talk) 08:29, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Allegation declined. Before coming to any conclusion or making allegations at least just check what's was edited by me on NMC Health. To remove Orphan tag, I made an edit that was just to link Prasanth Manghat. That's called DeOrphaning the article. I think you should know it.

I am reverting your revert from the article. Please stopped your vandalism and disruptive editing over Wikipedia. Please explain where the edits was promotional. Would request you to refrain from reverting my edits from article.

Let the others decide. You are disrupting me to improving the article. To resolve the issue I am inviting @SwisterTwister: as you accepted the AFC, Inviting @DGG: as you previously warned this (wikibaji) user for his/her Disruptive editing, Inviting @Edgeweyes: may interest you, as you previously interacted with user wikibaji. --103.51.134.25 (talk) 09:28, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I made some adjustments, but it is documented by the WSJ that he is the executive director. The main change I made is to indicate that his principal award is a regional award like his other awards, not a world-wide one. I may make some further, especially tyo remove promotional references. . I will check the article on the company. DGG ( talk ) 00:21, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dilesh Mehta (May 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gbawden was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dilesh Mehta and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Gbawden (talk) 12:29, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Wikibaji, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Gbawden (talk) 12:29, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Gbawden Wikibaji (talk) 12:43, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Erck Rickmers has been accepted

Erck Rickmers, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

» Shadowowl | talk 19:01, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dear User:Shadowowl, Thanks for accepting the article. Wikibaji (talk) 06:18, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Aam Ganv) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Aam Ganv, Wikibaji!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thanks for taking the time and trouble to create this - it's appreciated. It's now been reviewed and has had some improvement tags added. If you have the time, could you look it over and see if you can help address any of the issues raised in the tags? Thanks again for your hard work.

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 19:30, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Boleyn, Thanks for your appreciation. I definitely try to find few other references that prove it's existence. Wikibaji (talk) 05:27, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Wikibaji. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Bbb23 (talk) 19:49, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dear User:Bbb23, Please explain which accounts you found as sock puppet. Do you have proofs that i am handeling multiplae accounts? And what activities you found illegal? Please explain.Wikibaji (talk) 06:18, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Wikibaji, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Joseph2302 (talk) 11:47, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Wikibaji, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Sam Sailor 22:43, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Wikibaji, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Cabayi (talk) 12:00, 12 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Gurukul Sanskrit Mahavidyalaya, Suryakund, Budaun for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gurukul Sanskrit Mahavidyalaya, Suryakund, Budaun is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gurukul Sanskrit Mahavidyalaya, Suryakund, Budaun until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. KartikeyaS (talk) 15:24, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]