User talk:Wikieditor06

This is Wikieditor06's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Archives: 1

Welcome to my talk page. Here are some tips to help you communicate with me:

Please continue any conversation on the page where it was started.
- If I have left a message on your talk page please DO NOT post a reply here. I will have your talk page on watch and will note when you have replied.
Add or respond to an existing conversation under the existing heading.
- Indent your comment when replying by using an appropriate number of colons ':'.
- Create a new heading if the original conversation is archived.
To initiate a new conversation on this page, please click on this link.
You should sign your comments. You can do this automatically by typing four tildes (~~~~).

Archives: 1

OneRepublic

I think you made a mistake D: And since you just reverted your own edits, i think you're already aware. :P can u at least remove the vandalism thing on my talk page? please and thank you~ UnkEdit (talk) 13:19, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, sorry about that. I undid the edit on the page, and I thought I undid the automated warning, but Huggle crashed, and I forgot to go back and fix it. --Wikieditor06 (talk) 13:35, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion via G4

Hi! I noticed that you tagged Steve Dabbs as a G4 speedy. However, I couldn't find an AfD discussion relating to this article. G4 is a tag only for articles that have been deleted by an Afd. Articles deleted by the speedy or PROD process don't qualify. Of course, if there is an Afd for this article which I missed, please feel free to ignore this entire message. Cheers! TN‑X-Man 16:44, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The article was deleted through speedy deletion. I didn't know G4 wasn't used for old speedy deletions; I'll bear it in mind for the future. Thanks! Wikieditor06 (talk) 16:47, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

So Sorry

I had no intention to have some experiment on the English pages. Infact I am trying to translating this page into Indonesian to enrich our Indonesian Wikipedia since I am one of the contributor there. My user page is http://id.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pengguna:NaidNdeso Again, I am so sorry for this, since it was happen accidentally.

With regard to the pictures, since I can't find the Pics of DreamWorks in common, could you please advise from where I can get the pictures to be put in the Indonesian Wikipedia please.

Your help and guidance is much appreciated.NaidNdeso (talk) 21:44, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No problem... mistakes happen. I'm not sure where to obtain pictures, but Wikipedia:Image use policy may be of assistance to you. Wikieditor06 (talk) 05:06, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Century Mall

Pardon the intrusion but I saw that you are participating in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Century Mall and I have just completed an overhaul of the target article to both expand it and add references. I would appreciate it if you would review the article as it currently stands. Thanks. - Dravecky (talk) 21:26, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. The new page looks good; it was marked as keep before I could revise my comments, but the page looks good -- I would have changed my vote :). --Wikieditor06 (talk) 17:42, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I got a question.

I created an article,about a band called "Ajus", its an American/Brazilian band that holds records on iTunes Store for well selling Brazilian band in American Stores, its a shame to delete it, and its remarkable to deep think about it, hope you get what im trying to tell you.

Sincerily; LiveTV —Preceding unsigned comment added by LiveTV (talk • contribs) 23:21, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please see Wikipedia:Notability (music) regarding criteria for bands and musicians' inclusion in Wikipedia. Thanks. Wikieditor06 (talk) 19:30, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry. Signed, Vandaliser —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.233.91.65 (talk • contribs)

Mistakes

Hello sir or madam,

I have recently noticed that you have decided to revert several revisions to the page for Tuscarora High School. However, I regret to inform you that your deletion has removed some quality information for the page. I believe you may have not had the necessary information to base your decision on. There are several distinguished teachers at Tuscarora High School to whom you are doing a disservice by removing any information on them. I understand that Tuscarora High School is a small, relatively unknown school and you may have not known the consequences of your actions. That being said, there are many students who are very disappointed because their favorite teacher is not on the list of Notable Faculty. Please understand these teachers are the top rated at this particular high school; they are not simply random names. Thank you for your time in reading this. I know you will make the correct choice with this knowledge. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.2.194.209 (talk) 05:01, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your concern about the integrity of Wikipedia. Please read Wikipedia:Notability thoroughly; there are sections pertaining to criteria for inclusion of biographies and information about schools. The pages Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Citing sources may also be useful to assist you in making constructive edits to Wikipedia. --Wikieditor06 (talk) 05:09, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

You reverted the first and second vandalisms ever to my page! Thanks!--otherlleft (talk) 19:57, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Haha... my pleasure :) Thanks for your recent changes patrolling work too! --Wikieditor06 (talk) 19:59, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

recent thermite edit reversion

A couple of minutes ago i edited the section of ignition of the thermite page. it needs to be noted that a small fire WILL ignite thermite randomly and without any warning. a while ago that happened to me and i remember looking it up on Wikipedia and assuming that a small fire fell under "conventional ignition". i don't just tell you this for the safety of all of us dumb idiots, but also for the leg hairs that were lost. *sniff*

in all seriousness though, i do think that needs to be noted with regards to the ignition —Preceding unsigned comment added by Halcyon575 (talk • contribs) 02:49, 28 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate your concern; unfortunately, your edit was not appropriate for inclusion into an encyclopedia. There is already a section in the article dedicated to hazards, and I don't think an additional disclaimer or warning is necessary. I recommend reading Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia and Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not. You can also discuss a topic on the article's talk page to get insight from other Wikipedia contributors. Thank you for your interest in contributing to Wikipedia, and I hope you continue to make constructive edits. --Wikieditor06 (talk) 03:01, 28 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"Dollar Bill" Nickname

"Dollar Bill" is a commonly used nickname for William Jefferson in the New Orleans area and media. See the links below, for example (or just google yourself). Hence, to call edit out "Dollar Bill" as non-constructive, is, I believe, not contructive. In fact, the second image in the very same article refers to "Dollar Bill"!!

http://www.bayoubuzz.com/News/Louisiana/Politics/New_Orleans_Dollar_Bill_Jefferson_Cashes_In_At_Louisiana_Box_Office_Again__7666.asp

http://www.harpers.org/archive/2007/06/hbc-90000236 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.11.113.125 (talk) 07:55, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't doubt your assertion that he is referred to as "Dollar Bill." Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, however, and it is not appropriate to include such nicknames, especially in the first sentence of an article. If you refer to the article's talk page, other editors already discussed the addition of such nicknames as not complying with Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View. Please remember Wikipedia operates on the consensus principle. Please see Help:Contents/Policies and guidelines and Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not for more information on constructive editing. Thanks. --Wikieditor06 (talk) 14:53, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Saline, Michigan

Dear Wikieditor06,

The Saline MI page of Wikipedia is being used to indulge greviances here in Saline. There has been much back and forth on the page, especially in a section called "Fiddle Groups" and "More on Fiddle groups."

I lead one of the Fiddle groups in question. Our webmaster showed me where you restored a recently deleted section about the fiddle groups. I don't know who wrote it orginally or who deleted it, but I think that if you read the second paragraph of the section you restored you will see what we are dealing with.

This has been happening off and on for some time now. Our webmaster has monitored the site and in the past edited the section to correct the worst misrepresentations. You can't know whom to believe. I'm just telling you what your site is being used for and hoping you will form some opinion as to the state of mind of the writer of the deleted/restored section from the inflammatory wording.

Salinefiddlers (talk) 22:40, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

Thank you for reverting the vandalism to my user page. I really appreciate it! Cheers! Apparition11 (talk) 05:54, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am request please dont delete the bus366 please

Just adding very good comment for you.

I am request please dont delete the bus366 Please.

Elmore2007 (talk) 04:30, 1 December 2008

Please refrain from creating articles (and recreating deleted articles) that do not comply with Wikipedia's notability policies. Wikieditor06 (talk) 04:34, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Danite123 (talk) 00:32, 2 December 2008 (UTC)Hi there, I’m researching an article about Wikipedia, and its editors. I wonder if you I could talk to you about Wikipedia, and how you use it, for a magazine about not-for-profit organisations. If you could spare some time and wouldn’t mind answering some questions by email or phone, please contact me on Bennett.d@hotmail.co.uk, or leave a message here or on my talk page. Many thanks,[reply]

Daniel

You are not being fair.

Reason with me. I am not editing this. I am posting a new topic. I don't understand why you cannot believe what i have added in. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.53.55.50 (talk) 18:12, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits are clearly unconstructive. Please do not continue adding factually incorrect and unreferenced material. Thank you. Wikieditor06 (talk) 18:16, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Penusofnazarethpart2

Let's report him at AIV.--The Legendary Sky Attacker 05:01, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I see you've done that already.--The Legendary Sky Attacker 05:01, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done! Just wanted to give him his last chance even though it was pretty obvious he had nothing constructive to do here. Wikieditor06 (talk) 05:05, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This may or may not be helpful but that user was almost definitley a sock of User talk:Penusofnazareth69. I suspect he'll be back.--The Legendary Sky Attacker 05:08, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, I see. Thanks for the heads up. I've been away from Wikipedia for a while and lost track of these things. Guess I'll just go case-by-case! Wikieditor06 (talk) 05:11, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Billy Mays here

From my sources: "Billy Mays attacks white man, lives and dies later that night". So stop reverting my edits. xAXISx (talk) 00:32, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unfourtunately, that does not appear to be an accurate or trustworthy source. Please do not continue inserting nonsense into Wikipedia. -Wikieditor06 (talk) 00:34, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

King of the Hill and Hondurian Politics

I am sorry you are unaware of the links between the two. 70.54.11.190 (talk) 05:40, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

User:Chace Watson

this looks very suspicious. I brand new user (days old) who is extremely good wiki editor. writing a mock user page and occasionally blanks pages? Earlypsychosis (talk) 20:28, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cordell Mosson

What is your problem, dude?

I am TRYING to fix my page, but you think you know how to spell my name better than I do? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.144.33.177 (talk) 20:54, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize if I was wrong, but given the name of the page and your lack of references, it appeared that you were vandalizing. In the future, please provide legitimate sources and address issues on the article's talk page. Thank you. Wikieditor06 (talk) 21:01, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The discussion is about the topic Ancient Egyptian race controversy. Thank you.--Caspian blue 03:01, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Service awards proposal

Hello, Wikieditor06! I noticed you display a service award, and would like to invite you to join the discussion over a proposed revamping of the awards.

If you have any opinions on the proposal, please participate in the discussion. Thanks! — the Man in Question (in question) 04:15, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Trouted

Whack!

You've been whacked with a wet trout.

Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

You have been trouted as part of a Wikipedia-wide phenomenon, have a good day! Rsteilberg 17:40, 20 March 2011 (UTC)

Would You like to Help?

Hi, I am starting Wikipedia:WikiProject Ravidassia. I would like to get help from people who are interested. You may sign up for the project on the [[1]]. McKinseies (talk) 16:38, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:31, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

RC Patrol-related Proposals in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey

Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!

This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:

Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)

Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.

Note: You received this message because you have transcluded {{User wikipedia/RC Patrol}} (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.

Best regards, Stevietheman — Delivered: 01:11, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Wikieditor06. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]