User talk:Wildkatzen
This is referenced - Hare, Paul R. The Royal Aircraft Factory. London: Putnam, 1990. ISBN 0-85177-843-7, pp.208-209. The reference is at the end of the paragraph. An older reference would be Cheesman, E.F., ed. Fighter Aircraft of the 1914–1918 War. Letchworth, UK: Harleyford, 1960. pp. 44-45. Please stop nuisance editing on this point. It really was an oleo leg! In point of fact, as I hope the article makes clear, there were three forms of the undercarriage - The original oleo one, which had, in addition, a small nose wheel (which did indeed serve, as you noted, to help prevent noseovers rather than take normal landing loads). They were two separate elements - the nose wheel, if it were sprung at all (not sure to be honest) would have used rubber chord, the ubiquitous "bungee" of the day. The second form of the undercarriage was a convention "V" - all springing by rubber chord, the third was a cut-down version of the original, complete with oleo shock absorbers but minus the nose wheel. --Soundofmusicals (talk) 23:13, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
Panzershreck
[edit]Some reason you don't like my edit? Only the US test specified armor type, the static test penetrated more armor, and the firing test didn't pen the 2.25" backing plate.--MandolinMagi (talk) 02:42, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
- Prior to the revert I believed that the information was correctly referred. Yes it did, but not the second 2.25" backing plate. Quote: The whole was smooth, symmetrical and only gently tapered; very good performance. Hole came to end just at rear surface of first 2.25 inch plate. Second 2.25 inch plate only slightly pitted. (6" FHA + 2.25" RHA = 210mm). According to Karl. R. Pawlas, Dokumentation W127, the Panzerschreck was fired against "gewalzter Stahl" rolled homogeneous armour. Wildkatzen (talk) 21:55, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]
Hello, Wildkatzen. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |