Jump to content

User talk:Wna247

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

It doesn't matter about identifying sub and start appearences, I would like to keep the table the way it is. On the subject of SCAN numbers, feel free to put those back in I dont have a problem with them being there if it is unique to the club, Just thaught the previous table was a hell of a lot neater with everything centrally aligned. LiamTaylor 21:33, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nice One, I was at Forest Green watching it, poor game realy. LiamTaylor 09:02, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

In Reply to you....

[edit]

Do whatever realy mate, I'll happily do the write up, but I reckon you should do as I dont go and watch any games because im a Hyde fan, but its up to you, you know Ill always happily correct the errors but if you want me to do the write up just tell me. Cheers for bringing it up, LiamTaylor 23:02, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, no problem im happy to help anyone in any way.LiamTaylor 11:06, 27 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reply to Stockport season

[edit]

Go for it, you do that and ill make any alterations to the position or context IF NEEDED, so yeah by all means insert them. LiamTaylor 17:10, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Stockport County Ideas

[edit]

Agree with the GA nomination but I was going to wait until the season is overand the article is complete, but never the less we shall see how it goes. On to the awards, by all means add them cant see any reason why not as long as they are referenced, cheers, LiamTaylor 16:13, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]


The article 2011–12 Stockport County F.C. season you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:2011–12 Stockport County F.C. season for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Brad78 (talk) 23:25, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:Stockport vs rochdale.JPG

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Stockport vs rochdale.JPG. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 17:07, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited 2008 Football League Two play-off Final, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages David Perkins and Keith Hill (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:41, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Stockport County season (reference names)

[edit]

Hey Wna, I would just like to make a point to you that when you add a reference on Wikipedia, under the reference title section, you should add the actual title of the webpage you are adding. (For example, you added for ref[138] "Danny Rowe joins" when the actual name of the article is "Stockport County sign Fleetwood Town's Danny Rowe").

So if I could ask a favour of you, which is to go through the whole article and correct this problem. Thanks Wna, would be widely apprieciated! Cheers mate! LiamTaylor 17:48, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited 2009–10 Stockport County F.C. season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Michael Rose (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:41, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited Stockport County F.C., you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lincoln City (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:58, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article Danny Whitehead has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mattythewhite (talk) 19:23, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Danny Whitehead for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Danny Whitehead is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Danny Whitehead until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Mattythewhite (talk) 22:06, 4 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2012–13 Stockport County F.C. season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Braintree (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:54, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2012–13 Stockport County F.C. season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ledsham (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:01, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Stockport-County-1914-15-400px.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Stockport-County-1914-15-400px.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 20:05, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Stockport-County-1914-15-400px.jpg

[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Stockport-County-1914-15-400px.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:55, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Stockport County F.C.

[edit]

You know, you should stop being a pillock and actually make sure that when you use something as a reference, it backs up what you say. I saw the IP's edit, went to check it, saw that the official source that you tried to also used as a source, and reverted. Making the incredibly arrogant statement "had no right to be undone." when you're too fucking lazy to even check references is absurd... Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 16:12, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

September 2013

[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Stockport County F.C. may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • </ref> Stockport played in the first ever [[Football League Cup|League Cup]] competition in 1960–61}} beating [[Carlisle United F.C|Carlisle United]] in the first round <ref name="A brief history of

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:53, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (2003–04 Stockport County F.C. season) has been reviewed!

[edit]

Thanks for creating 2003–04 Stockport County F.C. season, Wna247!

Wikipedia editor Bobtinin just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Great job on your article on Stockport County's 2003-04 Season. Your article is almost perfect, just make sure to fix your referencing so it fits the standard model (I can help you with that) and fill in the tables/stats. Thanks again!

To reply, leave a comment on Bobtinin's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2003–04 Stockport County F.C. season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lincoln. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:56, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

August 2015

[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Stockport County F.C. may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • create. The matched finished 2-2 after extra time and as so was decided in a penalty shoot-out (the first in Stockport's History. Stockport went on to lose 3-0 on penalties.<ref name="County's

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:59, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Stockport County F.C. may have broken the syntax by modifying 4 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • {{quote|text=''"Stockport County FC is keen to maintain good relations with all clubs – including
  • |Crewe Alexandra]], [[Bury F.C.|Bury]], [[Rochdale F.C.|Rochdale]]<ref name="Football Fans Guide">{{cite book |last1=Williams |first1=Janet |last2=Johnson |first2=Mark |title=Football Fans Guide (

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:04, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Stockport County F.C.

[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Stockport County F.C. you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Casliber -- Casliber (talk) 14:40, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Stockport County F.C.

[edit]

The article Stockport County F.C. you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Stockport County F.C. for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Casliber -- Casliber (talk) 06:20, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:50, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, Wna247. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Wna247. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Wna247. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, 2019–20 Stockport County F.C. season, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 09:30, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:2019–20 Stockport County F.C. season, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:23, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Wna247. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "2019–20 Stockport County F.C. season".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Bkissin (talk) 20:24, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Sulfurboy (talk) 04:51, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Wna247! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sulfurboy (talk) 04:51, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Stockport County Logo 2014.png

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Stockport County Logo 2014.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:20, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Stockport_County_F.C.

[edit]

Hello:

The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Stockport_County_F.C. has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

One thing that may come up during the FAC review is the fact that many statements are supported by more than two citations. Unless a statement is controversial only one reputable source is needed. I wouldn't do anything about it at this point, just a heads up.

Best of luck moving forward with the article. I hope I caught everything.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 21:11, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2012–13 Stockport County F.C. season for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2012–13 Stockport County F.C. season is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2012–13 Stockport County F.C. season until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Spiderone 16:57, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:40, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2011–12 Stockport County F.C. season for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2011–12 Stockport County F.C. season, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2011–12 Stockport County F.C. season until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Crewe Alexandra

[edit]

Hi User:Wna247, inspired by your efforts to improve the Stockport County article, I've been working to improve the Crewe Alexandra F.C. article. I think it is currently B-class, but I would like to eventually at least get it to Good, so I've requested a peer review (first time I've ever done this, so I'm still feeling my way on the process). I hope you might be able to help on this. Many thanks. Paul W (talk) 12:14, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for your detailed comments. I think I have addressed the points made (do you have any more?), but will keep the review open just in case any others respond. Do you think this could be a GAN candidate? Paul W (talk) 09:15, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Wna247. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "2019–20 Stockport County F.C. season".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ƏXPLICIT 13:18, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Rochdale vs Stockport, Wembley 2008.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Rochdale vs Stockport, Wembley 2008.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:46, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Stockport-County-1914-15-400px.jpg listed for discussion

[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Stockport-County-1914-15-400px.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. — Ирука13 01:55, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]