User talk:Wolfman12405

Welcome!

Hello, Wolfman12405, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! --Animalparty! (talk) 21:32, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Lugassi) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Lugassi, Wolfman12405!

Wikipedia editor Animalparty just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

I removed many links that do not have an article: please see guidelines for Disambiguation pages at WP:DAB and MOS:DAB, and only add links that either already exist on English Wikipedia or are significantly mentioned in existing articles.

To reply, leave a comment on Animalparty's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Proposed deletion of Oshri Lugasi

The article Oshri Lugasi has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no reliable references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Toyedzapp (talk) 17:10, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Added References.--Wolfman12405 (talk) 17:17, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Daniella Lugassy

The article Daniella Lugassy has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no reliable references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Toyedzapp (talk) 17:31, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Added Sources.--Wolfman12405 (talk) 17:39, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Oshri Lugasi

Hi, I'm Dodger67. Wolfman12405, thanks for creating Oshri Lugasi!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Needs sources not published by the IDF

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 11:33, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The mountains aren't named after King Solomon, but the Islamic prophet Solomon, please stop changing "prophet" to "king"

We even have an article on him, see Solomon in Islam. And he's mentioned in Solomon, so I don't understand your problem. Doug Weller talk 20:17, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

April 2017

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Richard Howell (basketball), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. DaHuzyBru (talk) 04:21, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Added: [1].--Wolfman12405 (talk) 12:31, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ryan Sidney, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Contractor. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:44, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

WP:ARBPIA notice

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Also, please read WP:ARBPIA3, especially WP:ARBPIA3#500/30. New editors such as you are not permitted to edit articles related to the Arab-Israeli conflict until they have been registered for 30 days and have made 500 edits. Thank you. — MShabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 13:58, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

April 2017

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Zodiac Killer, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Please see WP:BLP - Mlpearc (open channel) 21:21, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I gave an IMDB link instead of YouTube, stop removing IMPORTANT 1st person details of the killer as were given by his victims.--Wolfman12405 (talk) 22:09, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please see Citing IMDb. - Mlpearc (open channel) 22:22, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Zodiac Killer shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Acroterion (talk) 22:26, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Slow down

Lets try to not see you blocked. Lets meet at Talk:Zodiac Killer..--Moxy (talk) 22:39, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ben-Azen, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Egyptian and Canaanite. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:58, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Videos on creating citations

These are really useful: Wikipedia:Meetup/UMassAmherst/Intro to Wikipedia. Don't forget page numbers for books. Doug Weller talk 13:04, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mose (Ancient Egyptian official), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Exodus. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:18, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

May 2017

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Alta Plaza, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Jdcomix (talk) 17:02, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Slaughter

Hi. This is wikipedia, and its ENCYCLOPEDIA. In basketball articles we dont use words like "prostitute" or "hooker". So please stop adding that to article. If you continue with that you will be reported and blocked. Thanks.--Bozalegenda (talk) 17:09, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Listen, buddy, this is the truth, you're more than welcome to ask mr. slaughter this by yourself, I am committed to depict reality as it occured. And I also added referrence to that. Ta, ta and farewell.--Wolfman12405 (talk) 18:41, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Its not problem is it true or not, thats just not for wikipedia. That is ok for some web page or blog but not for encyclopedia. You can add something like "he was released for disciplinary reasons" or something like that, but no need to add that "he spend night with prostitute".--Bozalegenda (talk) 00:50, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

the guy sleeps with poor women who are in the cycle of prostitution, the guy needs to be acknowledged as such. That's the basic view of life.--Wolfman12405 (talk) 05:21, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires proper attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Genetic studies on Jews into Moroccan Jews. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 14:16, 26 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Dong Yang Company Building as depicted on the 2006 version of their site.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Dong Yang Company Building as depicted on the 2006 version of their site.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. – Train2104 (t • c) 23:03, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

September 2017

Greetings. Some of your recent edits do not appear to be civil toward other editors. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to (re-?) familiarize yourself with our policies and guidelines. In particular, it's relevant that WP:CIVIL says, "Editors are expected to be reasonably cooperative, ... to work within the scope of policies, and to be responsive to good-faith questions." You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Trivialist (talk) 10:02, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

October 2017

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Zodiac Killer.

It appears that you have been warned about this issue previously, and on the same article. Please remember to cite sources Scr★pIron^IV 20:47, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I've always used sources-based claims and I've read all the available original VPD, NPD and SFPD report files.--Wolfman12405 (talk) 20:50, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You really need to read WP:BRD and WP:RS. The fansite that you have cited is not a reliable source by Wikipedia standards. Police reports are WP:PRIMARY sources, which are also unacceptable. Wikipedia uses reliable, independent, secondary sources. Please read up on those policies, and take the issue to the article's talk page, where hopefully the information you wish to add will end up being included after the community helps you find appropriate sourcing. Scr★pIron^IV 21:07, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Zodiac Killer. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Scr★pIron^IV 20:58, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Zodiac Killer shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Scr★pIron^IV 20:58, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Zodiac killer. Also stop making attacks on other editors. David J Johnson (talk) 16:50, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Wolfman12405. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

February 2018

This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on others again, as you did at Zodiac Killer, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Acroterion (talk) 18:03, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Acroterion (talk) 18:04, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Coolsville (Scooby-Doo)

The article Coolsville (Scooby-Doo) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG: no "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject". What's in the article now are trivial mentions.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sjö (talk) 04:57, 23 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 23

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Coolsville (Scooby-Doo), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Colonial (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 23 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Coolsville (Scooby-Doo) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Coolsville (Scooby-Doo) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Coolsville (Scooby-Doo) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sjö (talk) 17:56, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ARBPIA violation

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have recently shown interest in the Arab–Israeli conflict. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect: any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or any page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Your revert at Timeline of the name "Palestine" was in violation of ARBPIA which states:

If an edit is reverted by another editor, its original author may not restore it within 24 hours of the first revert made to their edit.

You will need to self revert it or face discretionary sanctions, "Editors who violate this restriction may be blocked without warning by any uninvolved administrator, even on a first offence." You have been warned. Veritycheck✔️ (talk) 01:20, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It's not a violation, it's a creditable and etymological explanation. https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/%D7%A4%D7%9C%D7%A9 --Wolfman12405 (talk) 01:22, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Regardless of your reasoning, you need to wait 24 hours. Revert now or it will be reported. Veritycheck✔️ (talk) 01:26, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

As you have refused to self-revert, the complaint is being filed. Veritycheck✔️ (talk) 02:33, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The root of the name "philistines" comes from PLŠ (פלש) which in both Canaanite and Hebrew (a Canaanite dialect) means: "Invader" (פולש).^[1]. I'd like a SENIOR EDITOR to have a third-party view over this.--Wolfman12405 (talk) 03:57, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You can insist on the correctness of it as many times as you like, but the rule you violated doesn't offer an exception for cases where you believe you're right, or even where you're certain that you're right. It would be kind of useless if it allowed for that kind of exception. —Largoplazo (talk • contribs) 21:42, 18 September 2018‎ (UTC)[reply]

References

^ http://www.morfix.co.il/%D7%A4%D7%9C%D7%A9

September 2018

To enforce an arbitration decision and for violating the 1RR restriction after notification on the page Timeline of the name "Palestine", you have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week. You are welcome to edit once the block expires; however, please note that the repetition of similar behavior may result in a longer block or other sanctions.

If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the guide to appealing blocks (specifically this section) before appealing. Place the following on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Please copy my appeal to the [[WP:AE|arbitration enforcement noticeboard]] or [[WP:AN|administrators' noticeboard]]. Your reason here OR place the reason below this template. ~~~~}}. If you intend to appeal on the arbitration enforcement noticeboard I suggest you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template on your talk page so it can be copied over easily. You may also appeal directly to me (by email), before or instead of appealing on your talk page. SarekOfVulcan (talk) 14:49, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder to administrators: In May 2014, ArbCom adopted the following procedure instructing administrators regarding Arbitration Enforcement blocks: "No administrator may modify a sanction placed by another administrator without: (1) the explicit prior affirmative consent of the enforcing administrator; or (2) prior affirmative agreement for the modification at (a) AE or (b) AN or (c) ARCA (see "Important notes" [in the procedure]). Administrators modifying sanctions out of process may at the discretion of the committee be desysopped."

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez Wikipedia article

You added valuable information to the Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez page. Unfortunately, a Wikipedia editor named Tsumikiria with major WP:NPOV problems has removed what you added. Tsumikiria noticed edits I made to the article giving context to the 2018 Gaza border protest mention, where Ocasio made it sound like the Israeli military was shooting peaceful protesters. Tsumikiria went postal on me, claiming I had defamed Ocasio, removing all my edits, trying to get me banned as an editor, before moving on to remove all you added. Right now the section on Ocasio's criticism of Israel re the 2018 Gaza situation looks like it was written by al-Jazeera. Please go back and fix this guy's mess. Thank you. Vcuttolo (talk) 07:58, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for notifying me! Was fixed.--Wolfman12405 (talk) 09:28, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary sanctions alert for articles and content relating to post-1932 American politics and articles and content relating to recently deceased or living people

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have recently shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect: any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or any page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have recently shown interest in living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect: any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or any page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 12:13, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure why you are trying to rehash another old "she said-she said" thing from half a year ago; it seems you are not aware that what you are inserting is pure opinion, and that there's contrary opinions too ([2], for instance), and that article space is not the place to have some sort of debate about this. Anyway, I wonder now if your interest is to improve the article or to somehow cast doubt on her reputation. If it's the latter, I urge you to stop. Drmies (talk) 22:43, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
And yet you persisted. Word of warning: you can get blocked possibly for WP:3R, certainly for WP:EW, possibly for violating WP:BLP--and on top of that you can get blocked/censured/topic-banned for violating AP and BLP guidelines: see the templates above, courtesy of Doug Weller. Drmies (talk) 00:53, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Wolfman12405. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 3

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Israelites, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Semitic (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:32, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You'd better stop now

You were blocked for a week last time you edit-warred over "Peleshet". If you are reported again, you are likely to receive a much longer block. On top of that, you doctored a direct quotation at Israelites, which counts as vandalism.

Given that these are not your first offences, you are lucky that I'm too busy to report you immediately. I won't warn you before reporting you if you continue this behavior. Zero^talk 06:44, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Lol, hell no, the truth will be heard. "doctored"? u mean gave proper information due to actual knowledge about the Genetics of the Israelites? cry all u want. nagger.-Wolfman12405 (talk)

Timeline of the name "Palestine" - use of a self-published and fringe book

If you did inline citations the way we ask editors to do, and I'll show you a guide, you might have noticed just how bad that source was. Authorhouse is a self-publisher and his other books are pretty bad. Even the title should have told you it wasn't an academic book.

But I can't revert again within 24 hours. You can self-revert however, and I'd appreciate it if you did. We need an academic source.

We need author, title, publisher, year published (make sure it's the real year, some books may show this year as the published year but then you discover it's a reprint of a 19th c book), page number for books, ISBN number. Read Help:Referencing for beginners. Doug Weller talk 13:40, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please temper your language

"Whinings" "u can cry about it"? Please read WP:CIVILITY and WP:AGF and revise your post at Talk:Timeline of the name "Palestine" as at the moment you are risking being taken to WP:Arbitration Enforcement as our discretionary sanctions regime includes an expectation that you will be civil and assume good faith. I won't sanction you myself as I'm involved on that page. Doug Weller talk 17:19, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I won't back down while defending the truth over incorrect historic depiction due to lack of knowledge at best and simply evil at worst.--Wolfman12405 (talk) 17:32, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

In other words, you're refusing to temper your language or assume good faith. Not a good move. Doug Weller talk 19:51, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

We shall see about that.-Wolfman12405 (talk) 21:45, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Arbitration sanction

Notice that you are now subject to an arbitration enforcement sanction

The following sanction now applies to you:

Three month topic ban from Timeline of the name "Palestine"

You have been sanctioned Continued uncollegiality, edit warring

This sanction is imposed in my capacity as an uninvolved administrator under the authority of the Arbitration Committee's decision at a-1#Final decision and, if applicable, the procedure described at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions. This sanction has been recorded in the log of sanctions. If the sanction includes a ban, please read the banning policy to ensure you understand what this means. If you do not comply with this sanction, you may be blocked for an extended period, by way of enforcement of this sanction—and you may also be made subject to further sanctions.

You may appeal this sanction using the process described here. I recommend that you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template if you wish to submit an appeal to the arbitration enforcement noticeboard. You may also appeal directly to me (on my talk page), before or instead of appealing to the noticeboard. Even if you appeal this sanction, you remain bound by it until you are notified by an uninvolved administrator that the appeal has been successful. You are also free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you. Drmies (talk) 22:41, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: this is a very small, narrow topic ban, but if you extend your uncollegial attitude and your habit of edit warring over POV-ish content, you are very likely to see this ban extended. Drmies (talk) 22:41, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Palestinians

Hello. You have violated the 1RR restriction that applies to all articles related to the Arab-Israeli conflict. See WP:AIPIA. Please revert your latest edits or you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. — MShabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 14:36, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nobody but u had violated anything u hypocrite crybaby.--Wolfman12405 (talk) 14:54, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. — MShabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 15:44, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I will never surrender to his shananigans and antics.--Wolfman12405 (talk) 17:01, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest to self revert you will be blocked pretty soon and also strike some of your comments--Shrike (talk) 17:25, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not part of those who fear to stand up to fabrications.--Wolfman12405 (talk) 17:36, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

אני לא אויב שלך יש פה כללים שצריך להתנהג בהתאם אם לא תתנהג בהתאם אז יחסמו אותך --Shrike (talk) 17:44, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I will chime in and say that the English Wikipedia has very strict and particular rules for Arab-Israeli conflict related editing, and that these should be followed. Discuss, do not revert too much, and comment on content - not editors.Icewhiz (talk) 18:08, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

January 2019

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for persistently making disruptive edits, including edit-warring, breaking 1RR restrictions, and being abusive to other editors. This is your third block; it is almost inevitable that if another one is necessary it will probably be indefinite. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Black Kite (talk) 20:52, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

As I said you was blocked and don't create additional accounts they will be blocked too pretty quickly also read the WP:Five pillars --Shrike (talk) 21:11, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of North African Muslim migrations to the Holy Land for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article North African Muslim migrations to the Holy Land is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/North African Muslim migrations to the Holy Land until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Huldra (talk) 23:51, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

1RR violation

Your edit here is a clear violation of General 1RR restriction for Arab-Israeli related articles. I'm giving you a brief opportunity to revert yourself. Otherwise I will report you. Zero^talk 11:26, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

LMAO look who's talking, hypocrite. Do u practice what u preach? I can also report you.--Wolfman12405 (talk) 11:42, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

March 2019

To enforce an arbitration decision and for yet again violating Arbitration remedies, being abusive to other editors when they point this out, and clearly not being here to edit collaboratively, you have been blocked indefinitely from editing.

If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the guide to appealing blocks (specifically this section) before appealing. Place the following on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Please copy my appeal to the [[WP:AE|arbitration enforcement noticeboard]] or [[WP:AN|administrators' noticeboard]]. Your reason here OR place the reason below this template. ~~~~}}. If you intend to appeal on the arbitration enforcement noticeboard I suggest you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template on your talk page so it can be copied over easily. You may also appeal directly to me (by email), before or instead of appealing on your talk page. Black Kite (talk) 12:12, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder to administrators: In May 2014, ArbCom adopted the following procedure instructing administrators regarding Arbitration Enforcement blocks: "No administrator may modify a sanction placed by another administrator without: (1) the explicit prior affirmative consent of the enforcing administrator; or (2) prior affirmative agreement for the modification at (a) AE or (b) AN or (c) ARCA (see "Important notes" [in the procedure]). Administrators modifying sanctions out of process may at the discretion of the committee be desysopped."

A Request

I wish u to remove all of my personal data off my Wikipedia user page here.--User:Wolfman12405 (talk) 18:09, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Even though you are blocked, you should still be able to log in and edit your ~~user page and~~ talk page. If you want to delete your user page, place {{Db-g7}} at the top of your user page. Mojoworker (talk) 20:56, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I guess you can only edit your talk page while blocked, not your user page. The request you made above was done by an IP not logged in, so I can't confirm it was you. If you log in and repeat the request, I can blank your user page (and add the DB-g7 template for you if you wish). If your talk page access has been revoked, you can contact Black Kite by email as he explained above, and I'm sure he will be able to assist you. Mojoworker (talk) 15:37, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sadly I can't take part in any editing session.--2A02:ED0:6DDE:8300:70B4:BAE1:1E03:613E (talk) 15:54, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have blanked the page for you, since your IP matches the location on your user page. @Black Kite: can you review and delete or restore as appropriate? Mojoworker (talk) 16:20, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

That's fine. I have deleted the user page. Black Kite (talk) 01:48, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

[1] ttp://www.morfix.co.il/%D7%A4%D7%9C%D7%A9

[1]