User talk:WorldbuildingArtists

Hello, WorldbuildingArtists, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the Teahouse.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Table of contents / Department directory

The Wikipedia Adventure (a tutorial orienting you with Wikipedia)
The Signpost, our newspaper

Need help?

Questions – a guide on where to ask questions
Cheatsheet – quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes
Wikipedia's 5 pillars – an overview of Wikipedia's foundations

Article wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
The simplified ruleset – a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules
Guide to Wikipedia – a thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia

How you can help:

Contributing to Wikipedia – a guide on how you can help

Community portal – Wikipedia's hub of activity

Additional tips...

Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.
If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills without changing the mainspace, the Sandbox is for you.

WorldbuildingArtists, good luck, and have fun. Mr. Rasel Hasan (talk) 06:00, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Keiken (December 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

See WP:COI.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Keiken and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 10:14, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, WorldbuildingArtists! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Greenman (talk) 10:14, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Keiken

Hello, WorldbuildingArtists. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Keiken, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:06, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello WorldbuildingArtists! Your additions to Draft:Keiken have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:

Limited quotation: You may only copy or translate a small portion of a source. Any direct quotations must be enclosed in double quotation marks (") and properly cited using an inline citation. More information is available on the non-free content page. To learn how to cite a source, see Help:Referencing for beginners.
Paraphrasing: Beyond limited quotations, you are required to put all information in your own words. Following the source's wording too closely can lead to copyright issues and is not permitted; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when paraphrasing, you must still cite your sources as appropriate.
Image use guidelines: In most scenarios, only freely licensed or public domain images may be used and these should be uploaded to our sister project, Wikimedia Commons. In some scenarios, non-freely copyrighted content can be used if they meet all ten of our non-free content criteria; Wikipedia:Plain and simple non-free content guide may help with determining a file's eligibility.
Copyrighted material donation: If you hold the copyright to the content you want to copy, or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license the text for publication here. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Copying and translation within Wikipedia: Wikipedia articles can be copied or translated, however they must have proper attribution in accordance with Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. For translation, see Help:Translation § License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 13:56, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! What passage are you referring to? Is it the quote by Hana Omori under "practice"? WorldbuildingArtists (talk) 14:00, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Content appeared to be copied from three sites: https://amosrex.fi/en/collections/keiken https://www.kanazawa21.jp/data_list.php?g=81&d=221 and https://presentfutures.org/feel-my-metaverse/ - UtherSRG (talk) 14:13, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I see... So you are referring to the whole content of the article? Generally, artists provide specific copy that they write, to all museums & galleries they work with, and that's why all the websites online use the same language about all artists pretty much, and that's why the language is repeated here. That being said, I am happy to paraphrase. How can I do it though, if the article is still under review and not yet declined? WorldbuildingArtists (talk) 14:18, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You can always edit after submitting it to review. - UtherSRG (talk) 16:14, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You can continue to improve the draft while waiting for a reviewer. The notice says "This may take 4 months or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 2,940 pending submissions waiting for review." So go ahead and work on it in the meantime if you like. — Diannaa (talk) 22:09, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Keiken

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Keiken requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://amosrex.fi/en/collections/keiken/, https://helsinkibiennaali.fi/en/artist/keiken/, and https://channel.somersethouse.org.uk/editorial-essay/how-do-you-understand-beyond-the-human. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UtherSRG (talk) 11:10, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again!Is this a new tag for the article to be speedily deleted? It doesn't have any copyright infringement at all though; it's all written fully by me, based on what I know about the artists and the sources online. WorldbuildingArtists (talk) 11:30, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have again removed some copyright content copied from https://amosrex.fi/en/collections/keiken/. This is the same content that I removed yesterday. I then removed the speedy deletion tag. Please don't copy prose that has been previously published elsewhere. To do so is a violation of our copyright policy. — Diannaa (talk) 12:03, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Diannaa: I'm still seeing quite a bit of copyvio from various websites. The fact that pieces parts are coming from various websites and not just one was the reason I had tagged for G12. Better to start fresh. - UtherSRG (talk) 15:40, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've done a little more cleanup. If you wish to get a second opinion, please consult one of the people listed here. — Diannaa (talk) 18:54, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Diannaa. I bow to your expertise. - UtherSRG (talk) 20:06, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I am looking at the copyvio detector, and if you compare the texts in question the information/copy that repeats itself is: the names of the artist and the translation of their name from Japanese to English, the university they all went to, the names of their artworks, and a direct quote by one of them that has been attributed to her. How can we change their names and the names of their artworks? I mean, there's no way to paraphrase those. What do you recommend? WorldbuildingArtists (talk) 19:11, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright cleanup is complete. Everything is fixed now. — Diannaa (talk) 22:52, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Keiken (August 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by SafariScribe were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Keiken and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 06:08, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]