User talk:Zack90

June 2015

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Balochi language has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Balochi language was changed by Zack90 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.902492 on 2015-06-17T16:08:45+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:08, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Warring at Balochi language

Hello Zack90. I've been trying to make sense of your report at WP:AN3. While doing so, I noticed you got into a revert war with an anti-vandal bot at Balochi language. This is usually a bad sign, suggesting that what you did might be vandalism. This may cause admins to wonder if you're the one who should be sanctioned. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 02:08, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your complaint about Kwamkagami has now been closed. See WP:AN3#User:Kwamikagami reported by User:Zack90 (Result: No action on Kwami, concerns about Zack90). Concern has been expressed that you are a sock of User:Mjbmr, but for the moment I'm not taking further action on that. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 16:02, 20 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

How so? because of Kwamikagami? Zack90 (talk) 17:12, 20 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No, because the evidence against you is not yet conclusive. If you keep working in concert with User:Mjbmr you could remedy that. If you have concerns about the material in these articles your best bet is to make a good case on the talk page and wait for consensus before making further reverts. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 18:16, 20 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Same behavior? can you check the history of these pages I reverted if there is anyone else with the same behavior like me and User:Mjbmr? have you ever asked Kwamikagami why he/she keeps emptying articles? Zack90 (talk) 18:27, 20 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

See this please, 4 people vs him. Zack90 (talk) 18:29, 20 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Zack90 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Why I'm blocked? Zack90 (talk) 21:29, 20 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

As noted in your block log, concerns are at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mjbmr. Kuru (talk) 21:52, 20 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Zack90 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please include the original unblock request.

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you

understand what you have been blocked for,
will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Max Semenik (talk) 23:57, 20 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Zack90 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand that English Wikipedia is not a place to write new articles about individual languages, otherwise getting wiped out by Kwamikagami. This is ridicules that you guys calling me a sock of Mjbmr please see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Mjbmr/Archive, more ridicules is that I got locked indefinitely here and wikidata. But I promise not get involved to help out a friend. following articles have already on articles other Wikipedias: Western Balochi, Eastern Balochi, Southern Balochi, Southern Luri, Northern Luri, so it's cool to ignore English Wikipedia and leave it alove with Kwamikagami. Pinging other users involved on Western Balochi article to see this: Great Balochistan, Ibrahim khashrowdi: guys leave English Wikipedia with this racist matter. Zack90 (talk) 10:29, 26 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

The conclusion that this is a sock account looks pretty solid to me. I am declining the unblock. Diannaa (talk) 13:55, 26 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.