User talk:Zayani55

September 2023

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Austrian expedition against Morocco (1829). This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. M.Bitton (talk) 11:21, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Sack of Cyprus (1368). Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. M.Bitton (talk) 12:03, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Almoravid-Ouagadou war has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Almoravid-Ouagadou war. Thanks! — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 21:36, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

thx for your comment but the war is really happened because historians like ibn khaldoun confirm this war Zayani55 (talk) 21:39, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I can't properly evaluate your French-language sources, but it's best when an article shows the existence of scholarly alternate views. — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 22:05, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

for the draft been accepted what i do? Zayani55 (talk) 22:57, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Jmcgnhpls respond Zayani55 (talk) 11:46, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I can't assess those sources properly, so we are dependent on reviewers who can. I'd like to see the book cites turned into cites to the orginal books, but that's just a suggestion. The other thing I would like to see is turning the statements that represent opinions attributed to people who hold those opinions. Introducing something as "In Arab tradition" is a good way to contextualize things, but it could be made less nebulous. — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 23:24, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sock puppet

Are you a sock puppet of Mrpf plus? Srnec (talk) 20:24, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Srnec: the chances that two unrelated editors start working (at the same time) on the same newly created articles are rather slim. M.Bitton (talk) 12:07, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

check our ip Zayani55 (talk) 12:13, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In the case of meat puppetry, checking the IPs means nothing. M.Bitton (talk) 12:18, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

lol Zayani55 (talk) 18:30, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

bro me and @Mrpf plusare friends and we work on the same pages seriously Zayani55 (talk) 18:33, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@M.Bitton: See this. Srnec (talk) 23:08, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

? Zayani55 (talk) 20:22, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

October 2023

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Aoidh (talk) 14:53, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

im not a suckpuppet check my ip Zayani55 (talk) 06:39, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Aoidhit cannot be check my ip i dont know even this "sockpuppet" Zayani55 (talk) 12:16, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

how can i proof that im not a sockpuppet pls? Zayani55 (talk) 19:00, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

innocent banned

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Zayani55 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i can't be a sockpuppet check my ip if you have doubts Zayani55 (talk) 13:43, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

That wouldn't matter in cases of WP:MEAT. Yamla (talk) 13:47, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

AfC notification: Draft:Almoravid-Ouagadou war has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Almoravid-Ouagadou war. Thanks! Vanderwaalforces (talk) 12:20, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]