User talk:Zevs pz

License tagging for Image:MattCardona.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:MattCardona.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:07, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:3987738.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:3987738.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 16:05, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:JeffHardymakeGermanSuplextoRVD.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:JeffHardymakeGermanSuplextoRVD.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 20:12, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Alekskirov.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Alekskirov.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 15:19, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Hebr2007logo.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Hebr2007logo.png. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 16:40, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Simeon Ivanov

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Simeon Ivanov, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Simeon Ivanov seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Simeon Ivanov, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 13:30, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Ceresit.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Ceresit.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 20:36, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

April 2008

Please do not add copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please do not upload anymore images until you under stand what "free" means and our licensing policies. If you need help, please ask. Just because you didn't pay for an image on a website, does not mean it's free. Just because you edit an image does not make it yours to release. MECU≈talk 15:24, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

July 2008

Please do not add content without citing reliable sources, as you did to Nikolay Dimitrov. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Contact me if you need assistance adding references. Thank you. Gwernol 11:59, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dilyan Iliev

AfD nomination of Dilyan Iliev

An article that you have been involved in editing, Dilyan Iliev, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dilyan Iliev. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? slυмgυм [ ←→ ] 13:48, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. It also uses {{Football player infobox}}, a template which has been renamed {{Infobox Football biography}}

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Dilyan Iliev. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you.

Replaceable fair use Image:PavlovsGK.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:PavlovsGK.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? J Milburn (talk) 09:12, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dimitar Berbatov

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.

Please do not change articles until transfers have been completed and confirmed by official sources. Any edits performed not under these circumstances will be viewed as vandalism DJDannyP//Talk2Me 21:29, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Overly detailed football kits

I have been removing overly detailed images for the kits in football club infoboxes. Template:Football kit states the following:

Do not create patterns for minor details on a kit, the template is for showing basic team colours. It is not supposed to be an accurate drawing of the kit.

For this reason, I have used only basic representations of the kits for clubs such as Levski Sofia. Dancarney (talk) 23:23, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop conflicting with the Manual of Style and adding the overly detailed kits. Dancarney (talk) 10:38, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

December 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to Daniel Kiss (goalkeeper) appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe our core policies. Thank you. – Alex43223^{T | C | E} 09:46, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

PFC Levski Sofia

Please stop removing the link to PFC Levski Sofia in Europe. If you do not approve of that page then take it to AfD or to the talk page. Meanwhile leaving an article orphaned is not acceptable. If you remove the link again without talk page consensus then it will be regarded as disruptive editing. TerriersFan (talk) 19:47, 17 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You're fast

Good work - he scored the goal nearly a minute before you made the edit :) --Laveol ^T 11:44, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Lúcio Wagner

Hello. The flag for the player Lúcio Wagner is Bulgaria. This is because he has represented the Bulgarian national team in matches recorded by FIFA. [1]. Although Wágner hasn't Bulgarian descent, in football terms, he is first Bulgarian, and Brazil is his second nationality. This one is the situation, generally, of any naturalized footballer, with descent or without descent. In Villarreal CF for example, Marcos Senna (Brazilian-born without Spanish descent) is Spanish, Guillermo Franco (Argentinian-born without Mexican descent) is Mexican and Matías Fernández (Argentinian-born with Chilean descent) is Chilean. I hope you will understand why the Lúcio Wagner's Bulgarian flag. See you later.--Kolins (talk) 21:57, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:LevskiSofia.png

Thanks for uploading File:LevskiSofia.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 12:05, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Левски София

Здравей. Искам да те питам защо си върнал моите корекции в статията за Левски? Виждаш, че някои потребители оспорват неутралитета на статията. Защо трябва да вмъкваме изрази като "превърнали се в празници" и, че сме "станали сила, с която другите в Европа трябва да се съобразяват"? Това не е някакъв фенсайт, в който да си пишем пристрастно. А и определено не сме се превърнали в някаква решаваща сила в Европа, макар че определено сме се засилили в този период. Само Левски! --RebornToConquer (talk) 06:08, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Извинявам се тогава. :) --RebornToConquer (talk) 17:35, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Joseph Eromoigbe

The article Joseph Eromoigbe has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about athlete who hasn't played in a fully-pro league and which fails general notability guideline.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jogurney (talk) 12:55, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Zevs pz! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 9 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 177 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Boyan Tabakov - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Ivo Mikhailov - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Todor Stoev - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Georgi Nedialkov - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Antonio Pavlov - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Radko Mutafchiyski - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Dzuneit Yashar - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Lazar Ivanov - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Dimitar Dimitrov (defender) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 22:17, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of Unreferenced BLP templates

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. --Jezebel'sPonyo ^shhh 22:59, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Once again, please do not remove the 'Unreferenced BLP' banner from the top of articles without addressing the issue as you have done (again) with Dimitar Dimitrov (defender). To continue to do so despite repeated requests to stop cn be considered disruptive editing. Thank you, --Jezebel'sPonyo ^shhh 20:07, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Levski players stats

Only official matches from "A Grupa" should be added in the player career stats. Friendlies and/or Cup matches shouldn't be counted and added. That's how the stats are for all the players in Wikipedia, but for some reason only the Levski players get unofficial stats added.

Само официалните мачове от "А Група", в които са взели участие играчите трябва да се добавят в тяхната страница. Приятелските срещи или тези за купата не се броят и не трябва да се добавят. Така е с всички играчи в Уикипедиа, но по някаква причина само с тези от Левски е различно.

Опитах се аз да ги оправя няколко пъти ти все ги връщаш обратно на грешните статистики...

May 2010

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Darko Tasevski. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. LoVeCa (talk) 18:00, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 18:28, 17 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ivelin Popov

Just a quick message to let you know Ivelin Popov has NOT signed for Blackburn Rovers regardless of what his club website says. He has only joined Rovers on trial. This has been confirmed by both the club and the local paper that deals with all direct Rovers news. Mainly The Lancashire Telegraph. I think somebody working for Popov's club is going to get the sack as from what i can tell the article on the website is complete rubbish! Take care anyway.User:RoverTheBendInSussex (talk) 01:00, 19 August 2010 (GMT)

Proposed deletion of Radko Mutafchiyski

The article Radko Mutafchiyski has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about footballer who plays in 2nd level of Bulgarian football. Appears to fail GNG and NSPORTS (see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Todor Dankov).

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jogurney (talk) 18:49, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Lazar Ivanov

The article Lazar Ivanov has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced BLP. No indication that a player of this name has appeared for Levski

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. J Mo 101 (talk) 14:22, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Asen Georgiev for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Asen Georgiev is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Asen Georgiev until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Oleola (talk) 23:49, 13 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Levski's stats

Please stop posting outdated or wrong stats.--Oleola (talk) 10:06, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Stats from this website are not as of 12 June 2011.--Oleola (talk) 10:10, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Football transfers

Please note that football transfers currently being announced do not take affect until the transfer window opens on 1 July. Please do not update articles for these transfers until then. Thank you. Sir Sputnik (talk) 15:48, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Levski's stats again

I told you that stats on levskisofia.info are not up to date, so why are you still doing the mess in the stats by stating that they are correct as of 13 June 2011?--Oleola (talk) 18:04, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Hristo Stamboliyski for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hristo Stamboliyski is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hristo Stamboliyski until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.== Nomination of Tsvetelin Tonev for deletion ==

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tsvetelin Tonev is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tsvetelin Tonev until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Oleola (talk) 16:57, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of OFC Hebar 2011

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on OFC Hebar 2011 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a club, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. WWGB (talk) 12:32, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:OFC Hebar 2011.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:OFC Hebar 2011.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 05:44, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Emil Kolev

The article Emil Kolev has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league. The one appearane for Levski Sofia listed in the infobox is not confirmed by reliable sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 23:03, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Georgi Argilashki for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Georgi Argilashki is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Georgi Argilashki until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sir Sputnik (talk) 16:49, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Georgi Argilashki

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Georgi Argilashki, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Sir Sputnik (talk) 18:15, 13 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

September 2014

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Georgi Argilashki, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion and appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Sir Sputnik (talk) 20:23, 13 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:37, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Daniel Shmedin for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Daniel Shmedin is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Shmedin until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

HawkAussie (talk) 11:05, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:FC Spartak Plovdiv squad

Template:FC Spartak Plovdiv squad has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Pelmeen10 (talk) 19:59, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Dimitar Dimitrov (footballer, born 1989) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dimitar Dimitrov (footballer, born 1989) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dimitar Dimitrov (footballer, born 1989) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:20, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Hebr2007logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Hebr2007logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:25, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]