User talk:Zouaoui16

Welcome!

Hello, Zouaoui16, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Mustapha Ishak-Boushaki, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! EvergreenFir (talk) 09:05, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Mustapha Ishak-Boushaki

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Mustapha Ishak-Boushaki. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – [[:Niels Bohr]]. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at [[:Niels Bohr]] – you might like to discuss new information at [[Talk:Niels Bohr|the article's talk page]].

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. EvergreenFir (talk) 09:05, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Mustapha Ishak-Boushaki

Hello Zouaoui16,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Mustapha Ishak-Boushaki for deletion, because it seems to be vandalism or a hoax. There is no Nobel Prize winner called Mustapha Ishak-Boushaki.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Sjö (talk) 09:09, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Mustapha Ishak-Boushaki

A tag has been placed on Mustapha Ishak-Boushaki requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

A7 unremarkable person. Originally csd nominated as A10 negater user copy pasted Niels Bohr

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. EvergreenFir (talk) 09:14, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Mustapha Ishak-Boushaki

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Mustapha Ishak-Boushaki requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Sjö (talk) 09:16, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

February 2017

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Mustapha Ishak-Boushaki. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. Sjö (talk) 09:16, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Mustapha Ishak-Boushaki

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Mustapha Ishak-Boushaki requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Sjö (talk) 09:17, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

February 2017

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove speedy deletion notices from pages you created yourself, you may be blocked from editing. EvergreenFir (talk) 09:19, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself. EvergreenFir (talk) 09:21, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself, as you did at Mustapha Ishak-Boushaki. Sjö (talk) 09:22, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 09:38, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Mustapha Ishak-Boushaki

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Mustapha Ishak-Boushaki requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. EvergreenFir (talk) 09:39, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dates

I would recommend against linking dates unless it is a significant part of the article. See MOS:DATEFORMAT for recommended formats. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 10:07, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Overlinking

Please see wp:overlink Unless it helps the editor navigate, please do not link. And, please link only once unless it is helpful (i.e. usually not) Thank you Jim1138 (talk) 09:30, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Cross-wiki article spamming

The article about Mustapha Ishak-Boushaki has been created at a number of language versions of Wikipedia, and Zouaoui16 has been blocked at least twice at SVWP for refusing to communicate, removing templates questioning Ishak-Boushaki's notability etcetera. - Tournesol (talk) 13:00, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Mustapha Ishak-Boushaki

A tag has been placed on Mustapha Ishak-Boushaki requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

This page has been recreated multiple times by the same user, warned by Tournesoul. It seems he is disobeying warnings given for the same article. When that article is speedily deleted, attempting to recreate it is generally not recommended unless the article can be different. While being warned and yes, blocked, the same person is recreating articles like these. It should be speedily deleted.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. *Xyaena~* (talk) 16:05, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

February 2017

This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at Mustapha_Ishak-Boushaki, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. That is enough of your deleting speedy deletion templates. When it is tagged, you let the admins decide. Instead of deleting the templates, contest the speedy deletions. I will not expect this to happen again. *Xyaena~* (talk) 16:27, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Mustapha Ishak-Boushaki

A tag has been placed on Mustapha Ishak-Boushaki requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

This page has been recreated multiple times by the same user, warned by Tournesoul. It seems he is disobeying warnings given for the same article. When that article is speedily deleted, attempting to recreate it is generally not recommended unless the article can be different. While being warned and yes, blocked, the same person is recreating articles like these. It should be speedily deleted. Also, the user who started this article has deleted a previous speedy deletion template. If that happens again, he will be blocked from editing.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. *Xyaena~* (talk) 16:29, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Zouaoui16 reported by User:Xyaena (Result: ). Thank you. *Xyaena~* (talk) 16:40, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

February 2017

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. NeilN ^{talk to me} 17:47, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mustapha Ishak-Boushaki for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mustapha Ishak-Boushaki is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mustapha Ishak-Boushaki until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Safiel (talk) 18:32, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mohamed Deriche, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kabyle. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:53, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Toufik Boushaki for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Toufik Boushaki is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Toufik Boushaki until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 04:13, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Zouaoui16. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires proper attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Académie française into Algerian Academy of Amazigh Language. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. Please do this even if you later remove the content, like you did here. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 14:57, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Diplomatic missions in Palestine

Template:Diplomatic missions in Palestine has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Galatz ^Talk 21:07, 25 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I am creating the articles dealing with the foreign embassies and diplomatic missions in the State of Palestine by translating their French and Arabic versions. Thus, the user Galatz is known as an Israeli supporter, and he has orchestered this operation of blocking my account. My work isn't vandalism nor disruptive editing, and the diplomatic missions of France is a valid template of foreign embassies. The other Israeli supporter Icewhiz has operated a process of deletion of all the foreign embassies and missions articles, as the Embassy of the United Kingdom in Palestine. Zouaoui16 (talk) 11:00, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notification

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Galatz ^Talk 19:40, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I am creating the articles dealing with the foreign embassies and diplomatic missions in the State of Palestine by translating their French and Arabic versions. Thus, the user Galatz is known as an Israeli supporter, and he has orchestered this operation of blocking my account. My work isn't vandalism nor disruptive editing, and the diplomatic missions of France is a valid template of foreign embassies. The other Israeli supporter Icewhiz has operated a process of deletion of all the foreign embassies and missions articles, as the Embassy of the United Kingdom in Palestine. Zouaoui16 (talk) 11:00, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

March 2018

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2018 March 25, you may be blocked from editing. [1] Dorsetonian (talk) 22:00, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I am creating the articles dealing with the foreign embassies and diplomatic missions in the State of Palestine by translating their French and Arabic versions. Thus, the user Galatz is known as an Israeli supporter, and he has orchestered this operation of blocking my account. My work isn't vandalism nor disruptive editing, and the diplomatic missions of France is a valid template of foreign embassies. The other Israeli supporter Icewhiz has operated a process of deletion of all the foreign embassies and missions articles, as the Embassy of the United Kingdom in Palestine. Zouaoui16 (talk) 11:00, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

AFD

Please note Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Embassy of Germany in Palestine which is a multi-page AFD with some 15 additional related articles.Icewhiz (talk) 13:53, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. DrKay (talk) 20:56, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I am creating the articles dealing with the foreign embassies and diplomatic missions in the State of Palestine by translating their French and Arabic versions. Thus, the user Galatz is known as an Israeli supporter, and he has orchestered this operation of blocking my account. My work isn't vandalism nor disruptive editing, and the diplomatic missions of France is a valid template of foreign embassies. The other Israeli supporter Icewhiz has operated a process of deletion of all the foreign embassies and missions articles, as the Embassy of the United Kingdom in Palestine. Zouaoui16 (talk) 11:00, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unblocking

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Zouaoui16 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am creating the articles dealing with the foreign embassies and diplomatic missions in the State of Palestine by translating their French and Arabic versions. Thus, the user Galatz is known as an Israeli supporter, and he has orchestered this operation of blocking my account. My work isn't vandalism nor disruptive editing, and the diplomatic missions of France is a valid template of foreign embassies. The other Israeli supporter Icewhiz has operated a process of deletion of all the foreign embassies and missions articles, as the Embassy of the United Kingdom in Palestine.

Decline reason:

You appear to have been edit-warring over a deletion discussion, repeatedly removing the notification that your article/template has been nominated for deletion. That's entirely inappropriate. You shouldn't be removing that notice at all, and you most certainly shouldn't be edit-warring over this. I'll note that Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Embassy of Germany in Palestine shows the current consensus is that your articles are inappropriate. I'll also note that I took a look at Embassy of Venezuela in Palestine, Embassy_of_Argentina_in_Palestine, Embassy_of_Germany_in_Palestine, Embassy_of_Portugal_in_Palestine, and Embassy_of_South_Korea_in_Palestine and I noticed they all have the same picture, purporting to be a picture of the embassy, but each article indicates the "embassy" is located at a different address. Deliberately introducing factual errors is disruptive. I say "embassy", because the ones I checked weren't embassies at all. I'll note there's also concern around WP:COPYRIGHT with your edits; you say you are translating articles but aren't properly crediting the source. I'm an independent administrator and not involved in whatever nationalistic dispute is happening here, but it's quite clear your edits have been very disruptive. Yamla (talk) 11:33, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

It unclear to me why I am tagged as a "Israeli supporter", however I wanted to point out that I was alerted to these articles by a post at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Palestine#Embassies in Palestine - and after thoroughly checking Embassy of Germany in Palestine (and a few others in-depth, the rest more cursory - but still sufficiently for AfD nomination) - I nominated all of them for deletion due to factual issues (beginning with the title, but other points as well). To the best of my knowledge I am not part of "Galatz ... has orchestered this operation" - as I was alerted to this separately via the Palestine wiki project.Icewhiz (talk) 11:45, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unblocking

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Zouaoui16 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Since all items have been canceled, it's time to unlock my account. Thank you.

Decline reason:

Unblock request doest suitably (or at all) address the reasons for the block. Amortias (T)(C) 21:53, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.