Jump to content

Wikipedia:AMA Requests for Assistance/Requests/December 2006/Lethaniol

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Case Filed On: 17:11, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

Wikipedian filing request:

Other Wikipedians this pertains to:

Wikipedia pages this pertains to:

Questions:

[edit]

Have you read the AMA FAQ?

  • Answer:Yes

How would you describe the nature of this dispute? (policy violation, content dispute, personal attack, other)

  • Answer: personal attacks, sockpuppetry, edit warring

What methods of Dispute Resolution have you tried so far? If you can, please provide wikilinks so that the Advocate looking over this case can see what you have done.

What do you expect to get from Advocacy?

  • Answer:Help in resolving the arguments and sockpuppetry allegations

Summary:

[edit]

Wikipedia:Requests for comment/BooyakaDell summarises everything but basically: There has been disagreement between BooyakaDell (a strongly suspected sockpuppet - but not yet blocked) and Curse of Fenric and a number of other users about the notability of various wrestling articles. This has led to uncivil actions and edit warring, and escalating official negotiation processes.

Discussion:

[edit]

Followup:

[edit]

When the case is finished, please take a minute to fill out the following survey:

Did you find the Advocacy process useful?

  • Answer:

Did your Advocate handle your case in an appropriate manner?

  • Answer:

On a scale of 1 (worst) to 5 (best), how polite was your Advocate?

  • Answer:

On a scale of 1 to 5, how effective do you feel your Advocate was in solving the problem?

  • Answer:

On a scale of 1 to 5, how effective do you feel the Advocacy process is altogether?

  • Answer:

If there were one thing that you would like to see different in the Advocacy process, what would it be?

  • Answer:

If you were to deal with this dispute again, what would you do differently, if anything?

  • Answer:


AMA Information

[edit]

Case Status: closed


Advocate Status: