Wikipedia:Association of Members' Advocates/Requests/April 2007/Kurrurrin
Case Filed On: 20:26, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
Your problem:
[edit]My problem is that I am having an issue with having my edits being reverted in the United Indoor Football article. There is a line that is almost clearly in violation of WP:NPOV, and so I initially removed it and stated as such in the edit summary and the discussion page. A user (66.245.130.173) undid the edit. So I tagged the statement as being of contested neutrality, and again asked for clarification. Another user (66.245.135.175) reverted that edit as well. I am assuming that it is the same user, as the first 2 octets of the IP addreess are the same, and the edits are of a similar gist. So, I have reverted his revert, requested either discussion or citation again, and am now here so as to find out what the avenues are to resolving this. It is a minor thing, yes, but I would honestly like to know for current and future reference. Thank you. Kurrurrin 20:26, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
Followup:
[edit]When the case is finished, please take a minute to fill out the following survey:
Did you find the Advocacy process useful?
- Answer:
Did your Advocate handle your case in an appropriate manner?
- Answer:
On a scale of 1 (worst) to 5 (best), how polite was your Advocate?
- Answer:
On a scale of 1 to 5, how effective do you feel your Advocate was in solving the problem?
- Answer:
On a scale of 1 to 5, how effective do you feel the Advocacy process is altogether?
- Answer:
If there were one thing that you would like to see different in the Advocacy process, what would it be?
- Answer:
If you were to deal with this dispute again, what would you do differently, if anything?
- Answer:
AMA Information
[edit]Case Status: NEW
Advocate Status:
- None assigned.