Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/DarafshBot

The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA. The result of the discussion was

Denied.

DarafshBot

Operator: درفش کاویانی (talk · contribs · SUL · edit count · logs · page moves · block log · rights log · ANI search)

Time filed: 04:53, Monday February 27, 2012 (UTC)

Automatic, Supervised, or Manual: Supervised

Programming language(s): python

Source code available: No, based on pywikipedia

Function overview: interwiki ~~and translate to fa.wiki~~

Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate):

Edit period(s): Continuous

Estimated number of pages affected: few pages per hour, or more but, firstly all changes will be check manualy, before its going to be very stable

Exclusion compliant (Y/N): N

Already has a bot flag (Y/N): N

Function details: My Bot not be able to edit on English Wikipedia! that was blocked. Mamad ^TALK

Discussion

Hi درفش کاویانی ! Have you read and understood WP:BOTPOL, especially WP:INTERWIKIBOT? Josh Parris 02:53, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Also what interwiki.py parameters will you be using and what namespaces will you edit? Also, why is the bot non-exclusion compliant? And what does "translate to fa.wiki" mean -- is this some other task in addition to interwiki? — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 08:51, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

{{OperatorAssistanceNeeded}} — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 09:15, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

sorry. i just run this Bot for Fa.wiki, but my bot was blocked. please open my bot. thanks Mamad ^TALK

It was blocked because it was not approved here, which this approval will be for. But you still haven't answered any of the questions. — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 15:03, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. i will run interwiki.py of pywikipedia in main article and category namespaces, i dont understand "non-exclusion compliant" :) my mean of "translate to fa.wiki" is a code that translate articles and template base on interwikis and we can creat artile abd list, such as List of waterfalls by height = fa:فهرست آبشارها برپایه ارتفاع. i think this not need approval (i dont know befor). thanks :) Mamad ^TALK

Again, what interwiki.py parameters will you be using? I still don't understand what "translate to fa.wiki" means. Is this something you want to do on English Wikipedia? Or will this edit fa: Wikipedia. Just as side note, that the edit above fails to have proper licensing/attribution that I can see. — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 12:10, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

{{OperatorAssistanceNeeded|D}} The questions above still need answering. Please try to keep an eye on this approvals page. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 02:07, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Mybe i dont understand your mean! i use interwiki.py of standard pywikipedia python interwiki.py please forget "translate to fa.wiki" because that dont use in English wikipedia and just use it in fa.wiki. Best Regards Mamad ^TALK

What parameters/options will you use with interwiki.py? See this list. — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 20:24, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

i use -array and -autonomous. Mamad ^TALK 21:58, 3 April 2012‎

Approved for trial (20 edits). Please provide a link to the relevant contributions and/or diffs when the trial is complete. — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 12:57, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Bot is block now. please open for bot can edit. Mamad ^TALK 23:51, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unblocked. --Chris 16:05, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done ;) Mamad ^TALK 00:45, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

my bot edit more than 20! please approve or Denay this request. Mamad ^TALK 05:45, 12 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Firstly, why did you go over the 20-page limit? Secondly, you said the bot would edit only article and category namespaces, but I see edits in wikipedia, and template namespaces. Also this is not an interwiki task. — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 07:44, 12 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Stepping in, citing WP:COMPETENCE, Denied. Josh Parris 08:15, 12 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA.