Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/Ganeshbot 7

The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA. The result of the discussion was

Approved.

Ganeshbot 7

Operator: Ganeshk (talk · contribs)

Time filed: 12:54, Thursday January 6, 2011 (UTC)

Automatic or Manually assisted: Automatic

Programming language(s): AWB Find and Replace

Source code available: Yes

Function overview: I would like to do a find and replace operation on bot-created articles between June 1 and August 16. Change " | unranked_familia = clade [[Caenogastropoda]] clade [[Littorinimorpha]]" to "| unranked_familia = clade [[Caenogastropoda]] clade [[Hypsogastropoda]] clade [[Littorinimorpha]]".

Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate): Wikipedia_talk:GAST#Error_in_Littorinimorpha_articles_by_Ganeshbot

Edit period(s): One time run

Estimated number of pages affected: 2570 (Pages created between June 1 and August 16)

Exclusion compliant (Y/N): Y (AWB)

Already has a bot flag (Y/N): Y

Function details: Ganeshbot made an error with adding the clades on the taxoboxes of Littorinimorpha articles based on the information that was available on the WoRMS website. Gastropods project is requesting that this be fixed with a bot. They would like the missing "Hypsogastropoda" to be added to the Taxobox. It is tedious for a human to do this. I plan to use AWB to load a list of articles from the history page and use find and replace to change " | unranked_familia = clade [[Caenogastropoda]] clade [[Littorinimorpha]]" to "| unranked_familia = clade [[Caenogastropoda]] clade [[Hypsogastropoda]] clade [[Littorinimorpha]]".

Discussion

Speedily Approved. Simple find/replace of an error (omitted taxa/clade) by previous run due to weird change at WoRMS that's not really compatible with more explicit WP system. — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 13:04, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA.