Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/Maelgwnbot 6

The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. The result of the discussion was

Approved.

Maelgwnbot 6

Operator: -- maelgwn - talk

Automatic or Manually Assisted:Automatic

Programming Language(s):pywikipedia

Function Summary:Clone of Chris G Bot

Edit period(s) (e.g. Continuous, daily, one time run): about every half an hour

Edit rate requested: 1 edits per 30mins

Already has a bot flag (Y/N):Y

Function Details:This bot will update Wikipedia:Australian_Wikipedians'_notice_board/AfD from Wikipedia:WikiProject_Deletion_sorting/Australia.

Discussion

Hopefully in the next day or so I will publish source code and provide a shut-off function. -- maelgwn - talk 12:34, 27 December 2007 (UTC) Source code - User:Maelgwnbot/source6 -- maelgwn - talk 14:19, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Looks sane.

Approved for trial (10 edits or 3 days). Please provide a link to the relevant contributions and/or diffs when the trial is complete.. MaxSem^{(Han shot first!)} 17:33, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see anything in the code to deal with "(2nd nomination)" this is one of the problems with my bot, which is why I try only to run it when I'm around(my internet has been playing up so this was nice timing!) you really should deal with this because with the bot running every 1/2 hour it will get very annoying for the poor person who has to clean up after it! Yet again I'm not a python programmer so I may have missed something but I don't see anything like

if $text =~ "(foo nomination)"

in there --Chris 12:19, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah thanks Chris, after uploading the source I read the talk page and have fixed that problem. I will try and update the source soon. -- maelgwn - talk 13:11, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well the trial is basically done. See [1] . They were a few updates part way through that caused errors when testing, but these are all fixed. -- maelgwn - talk 10:50, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I see nothing wrong here

Approved. --Chris 08:38, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.