Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/Mbak Dede
- The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA. The result of the discussion was
Request Expired.
Operator: Mbak Dede (talk · contribs · SUL · edit count · logs · page moves · block log · rights log · ANI search)
Time filed: 11:48, Monday March 19, 2012 (UTC)
Automatic, Supervised, or Manual: Manual
Source code available:: Standard pywikipedia
Function overview: Interwiki and send a welcome message to the newbee who have contributed.
Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate):
Edit period(s): Continuous
Estimated number of pages affected: 100
Exclusion compliant (Y/N):
Already has a bot flag (Y/N): Y N
Function details: Interwiki
Discussion
[edit]Firstly, you need to make a bot account for this task, you cannot run it from your main account. What tool/language do you use for this task? You have put both "Java" and "Standard pywikipedia". — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 13:01, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Why do I feel like this is on of User:JordanKyser22's sockpuppets?—cyberpower ChatOnline 21:38, 26 March 2012 (UTC)Never mind, this user clearly has more experience here.—cyberpower ChatOnline 22:04, 26 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Can I make a separate account for my bot named "Dedebot". Thanks.Mbak Dede (talk) 12:00, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Yes, you should. I suggest "DedeBot" or "DedeBOT" for readability. — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 12:01, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- I was created account "Dedebot" on Indonesian Wikipedia, but I want to change this username to "DedeBOT" with reason Readability. Mbak Dede (talk) 12:08, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- User:Dedebot only exists on idwiki and with only 1 edit, so I don't think it's a problem that you create a new account User:DedeBOT. — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 12:13, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
A user has requested the attention of the operator. Once the operatordiego87ramirez87 has seen this message and replied, please deactivate this tag. (user notified) This doesn't seem to be going anywhere. Do you still want to run this bot? Rcsprinter (natter) 11:46, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Operator is active but not addressing this BRfA. Request Expired. Josh Parris 12:34, 12 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA.