Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/SurenaBot

The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA. The result of the discussion was

Request Expired.

SurenaBot

Operator: Surena (talk · contribs)

Automatic or Manually assisted: Automatic

Programming language(s): Python (PythonWikiBot)

Source code available: Standard pywikipedia

Function overview: interwiki

Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate):

Edit period(s): Continuous

Estimated number of pages affected:

Exclusion compliant (Y/N): Y

Already has a bot flag (Y/N): N

Function details:

Discussion

"interwiki, welcome,replace text ,find bad redirect,move category". Welcome bots are not permitted by policy. What are you replacing? We already have a bunch of bots that find bad redirects and move categories, what does yours add? As a user with only 101 edits (including one to this BRFA), do you fully understand policies in place on Wikipedia and for operation of robots? FinalRapture - † ☪ 17:37, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

hi, i am a persian wiki user and edit in enwiki occasionally. my request means i can those work and i need bot on en Wikipedia for interwiki now, reason of my request is only for english wiki admins don't block my bot- can you help my what work i do for this?‪►Surena/^Discussion)_{29 Khordad 1389}-- 17:56, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you would only like to do interwiki please update your request to represent that. FinalRapture - † ☪ 17:59, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I update my request & only safe inter wiki & move category (can i safe move category request? if not tell me for remove this)--‪►Surena/^Discussion)_{29 Khordad 1389}-- 18:28, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

To move categories you would have to be familiar with our processes for determining consensus for moving categories. While you seem active on fawiki, you have not shown any experience with the English Wikipedia. If you want to run the pywikipedia interwiki.py here, you should be able to be approved for that once you have read WP:Bot policy, particularly the section on Interwiki links. Anomie ⚔ 19:19, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

i update my request and safe only inter wiki & i know how work for inter wiki--‪►Surena/^Discussion)_{30 Khordad 1389}-- 10:50, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Approved for trial (50 edits). Please provide a link to the relevant contributions and/or diffs when the trial is complete. for interwiki. MBisanz ^talk 02:31, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

{{OperatorAssistanceNeeded}} Any progress? Anomie ⚔ 01:17, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

now i edit whit my bot for finish my Trial period. whats wrong?|--‪►Surena/^Discussion)_{26 Tir 1389}-- 16:57, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your bot has only made 4 edits in the 24 days since the trial was approved. I was wondering if you had forgotten about it. I also see that one of your edits was to Template:Ancient Egyptian religion footer, which is currently not allowed by the bot policy for interwiki.py. Anomie ⚔ 17:49, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

bots run semi-automatically and I supervised it--‪►Surena/^Discussion)_{29 Tir 1389}-- 10:46, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

But it still hasn't made enough test edits and we cannot determine if the settings are appropriate for English Wikipedia. MBisanz ^talk 14:55, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A user has requested the attention of the operator. Once the operator has seen this message and replied, please deactivate this tag. I'm going to mark this as expired unless we hear back in a few days. MBisanz ^talk 05:20, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Request Expired. Tempted to mark this as declined due to a lack of understanding of the bot policy, but will mark as expired for now. Can always be declined/approved at a later date. - Kingpin¹³ (talk) 12:50, 22 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA.