Wikipedia:Featured and good topic candidates/400-series highways/archive1

400-series highways

The 400-series highways are a network of freeways in the Canadian province of Ontario which span across the southern portion of the province. The 1,925-kilometre (1,196 mi) network consist of the Queen Elizabeth Way and 16 other routes numbered between 400 and 427.

Contributor(s): Floydian

This extensive topic covers the 400-series highways of Ontario, the major freeway network of the province, which includes the busiest freeway in the world as well as the first divided highway in North America. Aside from one article on a highway under construction (which lacks crucial data until it is opened), every article is a GA at a minimum, and many are A or FA. (note that Highway 412 is undergoing a GAN as it was only completed on Monday) -- Floydian ^τ _¢ 15:51, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I thought the proper procedure was to wait until it's passed GA? There is no way of knowing how long it will be before it's passed for GA and all. MPJ -DK 20:36, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
And a "future class"? has that been peer reviewed etc. to hit the mark for content that may not be able to get to GA/FA status yet? MPJ-DK 20:37, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The GAN for Highway 412 is done and only awaiting promoted. However, I did miss the ball on sending Highway 418 for a peer review. Doing that in a minute. Unless a fellow WP:HWY member takes it on in the next 24 hours (I'll deal with any issues quickly), I'll put this nomination on hold and remove it from the queue. - Floydian ^τ _¢ 22:57, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Ontario Highway 412 has just passed GA. --Rs chen 7754 03:56, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- I would be happy to support once the comments at the peer review are resolved. --Rs chen 7754 04:53, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  - Support the issues at the peer review were resolved. --Rs chen 7754 18:01, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support, looks like a fine topic. Nergaal (talk) 16:22, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I remember seeing somewhere that FT/GT boxes shouldn't show a WikiProject A-Class rating (just FA/FL/GA/Peer reviewed) so that should be fixed. I can't quite remember where I saw it unfortunately. - [[User:Yellow Dingo|Yellow Dingo]] (talk) 05:20, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- If anyone else can second that info, I'd be happy to change it. - Floydian ^τ _¢ 02:52, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  - @Floydian: seconded- FT/GT only supports project-wide processes, and A-class is wikiproject specific. See the top box at WP:FT - there's no mention of A-class. I've changed it for you. --Pres N 01:17, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  - Oh, and Support; that PR should have been closed a long time ago. Incidentally, I think this may be the first "AA-class" (audited article) inclusion that isn't for an unreleased piece of media (video game, movie, etc.). --Pres N 01:17, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
support since the "future class" issue has been addressed, great work. MPJ-DK 14:36, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support since the icons and future-class issues have been fixed. - Yellow Dingo (talk) 07:34, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Closed with a consensus to promote to Good Topic. - GamerPro64 20:19, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]