Jump to content

Wikipedia:Featured and good topic candidates/List of Florida hurricanes

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

List of Florida hurricanes

[edit]
Main page Articles
List of Florida hurricanes List of Florida hurricanes (pre-1900) - List of Florida hurricanes (1900-1949) - List of Florida hurricanes (1950-1974) - List of Florida hurricanes (1975-1999) - List of Florida hurricanes (2000-present)

Alright, after almost a year of on and off work, all of the articles in the List of Florida hurricanes series is now either a Featured list or on FLC. They are distinct articles, clearly linked, useful, and of high quality. I know there might be a problem that two articles are not featured, but since both are on FLC (here and here) and are formatted mostly the same way (with complete citations), I don't think that should be a problem. I believe the topic is featured-worthy, and I'll be happy to address any actionable comments. Hurricanehink (talk) 02:39, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Update - per a comment on a FLC, the List of Florida hurricanes (2000-present) article was created; it has been assessed at A-class, and thus I included it. --Hurricanehink (talk) 03:50, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Update - List of Florida hurricanes (1900-1949) now featured. Hurricanehink (talk) 04:41, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Update - List of Florida hurricanes now featured. --Hurricanehink (talk) 02:05, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Update - All lists now featured Hurricanehink (talk) 13:32, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Conditional Support on the remaining two one getting FL'd- not that I have any doubt they it will pass, and I'm going to vote for them myself in a second in fact, but just as a "letter of the rules" thing. --PresN 03:10, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
All passed, fully support. --PresN 19:31, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Could you please mark the articles in the box with FA or GA symbols? That way we can keep a bead on their current status to decide voting as this nomination progresses. Judgesurreal777 03:33, 13 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Support. There's nothing wrong (error-wise) with this series. It'll be WPTCs 3rd FT if it passes. It is a good one, no GAs, I think that is a first in FT history.Mitch32contribs 17:53, 20 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There are actually five existing topics without any GAs, but it's impressive nonetheless. --Arctic Gnome (talkcontribs) 18:10, 20 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]