Jump to content

Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Enoch Fenwick/archive1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of a featured article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The article was promoted by Hog Farm via FACBot (talk) 12 June 2022 [1].


Nominator(s): Ergo Sum 01:39, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This article is about a Jesuit who, fascinatingly, followed in his brother's (FA) footsteps in becoming the president of Georgetown University, which did not go so well, and he abandoned the presidency and refused to return. Ergo Sum 01:39, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Image is appropriately licensed, but are there no images of the subject? Nikkimaria (talk) 02:52, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by Pseud 14

[edit]

General comments from someone who is unfamiliar with the topic and generally not my area of Wikipedia-interest.

Thanks for your review, Pseud 14. Ergo Sum 01:36, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by Z1720

[edit]

Non-expert prose review. Only one concern:

  • "Enoch Fenwick was born on May 15, 1780, in St. Mary's County, Maryland, one of four brothers, three of whom would become priests" This is a lot of information for one sentence, so I suggest putting a period after Maryland, as so: "Enoch Fenwick was born on May 15, 1780, in St. Mary's County, Maryland. He was one of four brothers, three of whom would become priests."

I checked the lede and infobox, and everything is in the article. Z1720 (talk) 14:44, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Z1720. Do let me know if you have any other concerns. Ergo Sum 21:56, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support My concern was addressed and I do not have other concerns. Z1720 (talk) 00:14, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Source review

[edit]

Pass. There are quite a few old sources used here, but they're used to support uncontroversial information of a kind that these sources can be considered reliable for. Formatting looks fine. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 16:05, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from Kavyansh

[edit]

Support: That is it, nothing major! Great work! – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 06:31, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your review, Kavyansh.Singh. Ergo Sum 10:56, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.