Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Number 1's (Mariah Carey album)/archive1
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The article was not promoted by SandyGeorgia 06:58, 23 October 2010 [1].
Number 1's (Mariah Carey album) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
- Nominator(s): CallMeNathan • Talk2Me 08:22, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I am nominating this for featured article because I feel it fits all FAC criteria. I recently re-constructed the entire article, this being my 5th album page to do so, so I feel pretty confident its of good quality. Thanks to everyone who leaves comments, and yes, even you negative bimbos :p CallMeNathan • Talk2Me 08:22, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment—dab links to Dan Shea and I'll Be There, and a dead external link to http://www.fimi.it/classifiche.asp?idtipo_classifica=1. Ucucha 11:14, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Fixed :)--CallMeNathan • Talk2Me 17:45, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Sources comments: Mainly nitpicks
Ref 4: Vibe should be italicised (print source)Ref 22: Likewise, Entertainment Weekly should be italicised. If the review doesn't come from the print journal, then show work as EW.comRef 23: New Musical Express - italiciseRef 25: If "Slant" is purely an online mag, with no print version, the name should not be italicisedRef 32: Indicate that the site language is FrenchRef 49: Indicate that the site language is ItalianRef 53 is not formatted correctlyRef 56: Language (Portuguese?)Refs 57, 59, 61 and perhaps others: Languages?
Otherwise, sources/citations look OK. Brianboulton (talk) 16:59, 7 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Hi there. Its all fixed! =)--CallMeNathan • Talk2Me 01:16, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from TbhotchTalk C. 01:25, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
*Reviewing... TbhotchTalk C. 02:46, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
|
- Support All done, I have no mayor issues, so this is a strong support. Excellent work Nathan. TbhotchTalk C. 03:56, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Thank you very much Tbhotch! And thanks for the help/advice =)--CallMeNathan • Talk2Me 03:57, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- You're welcome. TbhotchTalk C. 04:00, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Thank you very much Tbhotch! And thanks for the help/advice =)--CallMeNathan • Talk2Me 03:57, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Almost at three-week mark, no consensus to promote; please try again in a few weeks. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 06:40, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.