Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/The Concert in Central Park/archive2
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The article was not promoted by GrahamColm 17:32, 2 August 2012 [1].
The Concert in Central Park (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
| Toolbox |
|---|
The first nomination failed due to prose issues. This article was then copyedited by User:Dementia13, and other users assisted. I hope the article now meets the criteria. Regards.GoPTCN 11:47, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This is a WikiCup nomination. The following nominators are WikiCup participants: GreatOrangePumpkin. To the nominator: if you do not intend to submit this article at the WikiCup, feel free to remove this notice. UcuchaBot (talk) 00:01, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment -
- Part of technical review as part of WP:QAI's efforts to improve technical aspects of our wiki's quality articles....
- Refs 5, 10, 20, 24, and 44, all use et seq but some say p and the others pp. PP is prob best here.
- Done
- The publisher name in some refs starts with a uppercase letter and in other lc.
- I don't understand why the website name is part of the title in many refs, and in other refs it's missing, another inconsistency
- SFN/HARV notes are not required by FAC but are well worth considering; it makes reading the article in edit mode much easier, among other things
- FN 71 is missing a retrieve date PumpkinSky talk 01:16, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Refs 5, 10, 20, 24, and 44, all use et seq but some say p and the others pp. PP is prob best here.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.