Wikipedia:Featured article review/Corinthian War/archive1
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured article review. Please do not modify it. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review. No further edits should be made to this page.
The article was delisted by Nikkimaria via FACBot (talk) 4:01, 8 January 2022 (UTC) [1].
- Notified: Robth, पाटलिपुत्र, WP MILHIST, WP Greece, WP Classical Greece and Rome, WP Iran, noticed in August
Review section
[edit]As noted by T8612 on the article's talk page, this article is too reliant on the ancient source of Xenophon to the neglect of some modern scholarly works. Additionally, there are bits of uncited text. Hog Farm Talk 05:11, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Sadly I think that this needs WP:BLOWITUP. It is essentially a start class article, with so much un- and badly sourced material that muc of it is even a good starting point. A good read, but nowhere near FA standard. Gog the Mild (talk) 12:47, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Move to FARC - Nothing to speak of happening. Hog Farm Talk 21:01, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Move to FARC no edits (t · c) buidhe 07:03, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
FARC section
[edit]- Issues raised in the review section largely concern sourcing. Nikkimaria (talk) 03:47, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist minimal progress on fixing issues (t · c) buidhe 19:40, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist, no sustained engagement to address the issues raised. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 19:43, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist. Tagged for unsourced statements. DrKay (talk) 15:17, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist, sourcing needs overhauled and improvements have not occurred there. Hog Farm Talk 16:32, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist while there were some edits to the article in December, these did not address the sourcing concerns. Z1720 (talk) 17:42, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist. I might work on this in the distant future. T8612 (talk) 19:29, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist per the above issues. NoahTalk 03:37, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This removal candidate has been delisted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please leave the {{featured article review}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Nikkimaria (talk) 04:01, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.