Wikipedia:Featured article review/The Quatermass Experiment/archive2
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured article review. Please do not modify it. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review. No further edits should be made to this page.
The article was delisted by Nikkimaria via FACBot (talk) 3:52, 15 April 2023 (UTC) [1].
- Notified: User: Angmering, User Heartfox,WikiProject BBC, British television task force, talk notice 2023-01-26
Review section
[edit]I am nominating this featured article for review because of the following issues:
- Some of the citations do not appear to be reliable/have editorial oversight (IMDb, The Quatermass Home Page, Doctor Who Restoration Team, Mausoleum Club).
- Viewership figures would benefit from footnotes.
- Fn 15 and 21 lack page numbers.
- The last sentence has no citation.
- I don't know if a BBC DVD should be used to cite "Viewers' responses were generally positive" for a BBC program; how can this be a neutral source?
- Are there any other newspapers/magazines from the time period that can be used to cite/add stuff that are now available online?
- The article has 24 cn tags. Desertarun (talk) 20:09, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Quatermass Home Page is an interview with the guy who created the show, so that's probably fine. Doctor Who Restoration Team was given a (weak) vote of sorta-confidence at Wikipedia:Featured article review/Quatermass and the Pit/archive1. Will try to look at the other sourcing issues soon. Hog Farm Talk 18:50, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Problems I found
- Removed a [citation needed]-tagged sentence from the intro, as it was info not expanded on in the body.
- Is Screen Online an RS?
- Removed "Quatermass Homepage", an archive of a geocities fansite.
- [Citation needed]s all over the place, including "Other Media".
- Lots of choppy one-sentence paragraphs, including "Production" and "Other Media".
- Viewership numbers in the "Episodes" table are unsourced. I also think this should be converted to text, as a table is a lot for only six episodes and it disrupts the flow.
- "Mausoleum Club" link was 404, and this appears to have been a web forum so I don't think it was a RS to begin with
- Is Digital Fix an RS?
Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 18:57, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- I think the Geocities source may be a WP:SPS that meets reliability (if it's the same one we checked last time through), but nonetheless, per the other issues raised, Move to FARC. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 19:26, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- As I noted above, the Geocities page was actually fine here as a WP:SPS interview with the series writer, but this needs substantive work across the board, so move to FARC. Hog Farm Talk 20:10, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
FARC section
[edit]- Sourcing. Nikkimaria (talk) 02:47, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist unless the issues above manage to be addressed. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 03:15, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist. Little engagement. Desertarun (talk) 20:26, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist sourcing problems unresolved. Hog Farm Talk 13:13, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist no significant edits in recent weeks to address issues. Z1720 (talk) 14:00, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This removal candidate has been delisted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please leave the {{featured article review}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Nikkimaria (talk) 03:52, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.