Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/20–20–20 club/archive2

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 30 June 2020 (UTC) [1].[reply]

20–20–20 club

Nominator(s): Bloom6132 (talk) 01:17, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I am nominating this for featured list because I feel its structure and formatting mirrors the other baseball lists I have successfully nominated to FL and it now meets all 6 FL criteria. The last FLC 8 years ago was a close split over whether this list satisfied criteria 3b, and two months later, one admin stated that he "would have supported that one [i.e. this list] as there was no good place to merge it". —Bloom6132 (talk) 01:17, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support A solid article. ~ HAL 333 01:49, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support - I tried really hard but couldn't find anything to pick you up on - great work! -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 15:11, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by Shearonink

Comment Loved this list, the text was nicely-written and the permissions etc for the image of Mays and for the image of Brett pass muster. However, the image of Granderson and the image of Rollins are problematic. I think other photos of these two gentlemen will probably have to be found.

Granderson - Source is rendered as being from a flickr account but when I went to that account the image no longer exists. The real sticking point though is that all the KA Sports Photos/keith allison images I checked (including 2018 photos of Granderson) have "copyright:all rights reserved" tags.

@Shearonink: I think the photo can still be used, since it was licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 2.0 Generic on the date it was uploaded (much like how this photo was given the same permission). In fact, Creative Commons states how "The licenses and CC0 cannot be revoked. This means once you apply a CC license to your material, anyone who receives it may rely on that license for as long as the material is protected by copyright, even if you later stop distributing it." —Bloom6132 (talk) 00:55, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, yeah you're right. I missed the part about confirming the license at that time bit. My bad. Looks like this photog has changed their mind about their photos' licenses since both the present Rollins and Granderson images were taken by the same person & originally given a CCbySA licensure. Shearonink (talk) 03:12, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Rollins - Source info is probably invalid. The source is stated to be "Googie Man" or "Googie man" a blocked user who apparently had a lot of image file issues during their time on-wiki. When I checked the image's status, the Commons page says the source is Wikipedia and the Wikipedia file page says the source is Commons...and in both the source info states the creator was Googie man. Which seems probably not to be the case...

@Shearonink: Agreed – I've now replaced the photo. —Bloom6132 (talk) 00:55, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Shearonink (talk) 16:02, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support on the images and other aspects of the List. Shearonink (talk) 03:12, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Source review passed; promoting. --Pres N 03:50, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.