Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/66th Academy Awards/archive1

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by SchroCat 14:35, 15 January 2014 [1].

66th Academy Awards

Featured list candidates/66th Academy Awards/archive1

Nominator(s): Birdienest81 (talk) 18:26, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I am nominating the 1994 Oscars for featured list because I believe it has great potential to become a Featured List. I read the requirements and criteria. I also followed how the 1929, 1989, 1990, 1992, 1996, 2000, 2004, 2009, 2010, and 2012 Oscars were written. --Birdienest81 (talk) 18:26, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not a big fan of the new awards table layout, why the change? Those who've seen my reviews elsewhere may know I'm also not a fan of inconsistency across related articles.
The multiple awards table should end with a colon.
Good work overall. Reywas92^Talk 06:15, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed: I reverted the table to an older format. I also added the colon.

--Birdienest81 (talk) 05:37, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Support Reywas92^Talk 04:56, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved comments from Giants2008 (Talk) 23:03, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comments –

Winners and nominees: Double word in "at at the Samuel Goldwyn Theater in Beverly Hills".
Presenters and performers: In the first item listed, "Annual" probably shouldn't be capitalized in the activity note.
Ceremony information: Double period by ref 20.
More double punctuation by the first usage of ref 21.
Last word of "featuring a saluting" should be "salute" instead.
Critical reviews: A period is needed after the first quote from Janet Maslin.
All caps in ref 37 should be removed. Giants2008 (Talk) 03:28, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed: I fixed everything you suggested above. I added the word "ceremonies" to the phrase "As with previous he produced".

--Birdienest81 (talk) 06:37, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A word appears to be missing from "As with previous he produced".
- Word added, but "he" and "ceremonies" should be reversed. Giants2008 (Talk) 23:03, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed: I switched the words and added slight more info about the show's theme.

--Birdienest81 (talk) 23:22, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Support: Great work! No issues so far.--Jagarin 20:38, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
Support Although I consider the tables for multiple nominations and awards unnecessary. As for this list, good work!--Earthh (talk) 22:23, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. - SchroCat (talk) 14:44, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.