Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of CMLL World Heavyweight Champions/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by Matthewedwards 20:37, 21 April 2009 [1].
I nominate this list for Featured List status as I believe it fullfills all the FL requirements. It's also had the benefit of being updated according to all the input I got on the List of Mexican National Heavyweight Champions review. MPJ-DK (talk) 06:42, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from Truco
|
---|
|
- Support -- Previous issues resolved; article now meets WP:WIAFL. Excellent job.--Truco 14:28, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from Giants2008
|
---|
Comments - Except for this handful of items, it's a very nice list overall.
(17-14) 01:45, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
|
Support - My issues are all resolved. There were apparently some things I didn't catch, but those are now done as well, and I'm comfortable that this is FL-level. Giants2008 (17-14) 23:09, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support, all issues resolved. Dabomb87 (talk) 21:58, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved issues, Dabomb87 (talk) |
---|
Comments from Dabomb87 (talk · contribs)
Dabomb87 (talk) 21:41, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply] Final comment All the names in the table should be linked because it is sortable. Dabomb87 (talk) 21:59, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
|
Sources look good. Dabomb87 (talk) 21:58, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Per MOS, link titles should not be in all caps; convert them to title case (ref 2)
- I left it as it was formatted in the source but now it's been updated. MPJ-DK (talk) 07:26, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Ref 2 also needsDabomb87 (talk) 21:41, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]format=PDF
added to it.
- Done. MPJ-DK (talk) 07:26, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Quick Note The latest reign has the number of days with 2 right brackets. --Numyht (talk) 16:18, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- You're right I can't believe I missed that. MPJ-DK (talk) 21:14, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comments from Wrestlinglover
- Support
Resolved comments from Wrestlinglover
|
---|
|
- Also de-link all links that appear red, they just are unpleasant, but not a requirement.--WillC 15:33, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Please do not delink the red links if they are of notable subjects. Per WP:RED, red links are good. Dabomb87 (talk) 21:09, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I agree, especially since there are only 3 redlinks and they're likely to get articles, they're definitly notable enough and I personally plan on writing all three with time unless someone beats me to it. MPJ-DK (talk) 07:43, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Okay, fair enough. No problem.--WillC 08:09, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I agree, especially since there are only 3 redlinks and they're likely to get articles, they're definitly notable enough and I personally plan on writing all three with time unless someone beats me to it. MPJ-DK (talk) 07:43, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Please do not delink the red links if they are of notable subjects. Per WP:RED, red links are good. Dabomb87 (talk) 21:09, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Are you sure you can't find the date for when Sean Morley vacated the championship? It seems like a big gap, especially where the combined length table is concerned. -- Scorpion0422 20:06, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Nothing I've found so far indicates a more specific date I'm afraid. It's also not that big a gap, he held it approximately 5 months, 150 days or so putting him in the low end of "combined length" if there was a definite date. MPJ-DK (talk) 20:26, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Nonetheless, he would be on the table, so it can be counted as incomplete. -- Scorpion0422 20:42, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Since there is no specific date though it would be considered Original Research If i put an approximate number of days on there, the list contains what can be confirmed. MPJ-DK (talk) 04:55, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Adding an approximate number actually would not be original research because it would be guess work based on existing sources. Why not add him to number 10 in the table with no specified number of days, then add a note that says he vacated the title some time in September, so his reign could be between 136 and 165 days? -- Scorpion0422 17:58, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I like that suggestion, I added him with the note and all, looks alright. MPJ-DK (talk) 05:56, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.