Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Chicago Blackhawks head coaches/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by Matthewedwards 22:39, 27 June 2009 [1].
- Nominator(s): -- [[SRE.K.A.L.|L.A.K.ERS]] 16:00, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Toolbox |
---|
Never done these lists in quite a while, but I do believe it is better than my other head coaches featured lists. Grammar corrections can go straight to the article. Thanks in advance and happy reviewing! -- [[SRE.K.A.L.|L.A.K.ERS]] 16:00, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Support No dab links, no dead refs, reference format looks good, article and table format looks good, AWB general fixes ok, all refs have publisher and accessdate.--Kumioko (talk) 03:36, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from Chrishomingtang
|
---|
Comment
|
- Support - ok, looks good now —Chris! ct 00:34, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from Truco
|
---|
Comments
|
- Support -- Previous issues clarified/resolved; list now meets WP:WIAFL.--Truco 503 23:40, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hiding resolved issue
|
---|
(→)All right, my concern can be easily addressed. All you need to do is remove the templates Rambo added(thanks for trying, Rambo!) and shorten the word "Reference" making it "Ref". I know it's easier done, than said, but still...--Crzycheetah 01:39, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
|
- Support Main issues resolved. – (iMatthew • talk) at 01:29, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Support - My only problem with the list was the image stack-up, and that seems to have been fixed now (at least for 1024x768). TheLeftorium 11:05, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support, all issues resolved. Dabomb87 (talk) 21:26, 27 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved issues, Dabomb87 (talk) |
---|
Comments from Dabomb87 (talk · contribs)
|
Sources look good. Dabomb87 (talk) 15:23, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from Giants2008
|
---|
*Comments –
|
Support – I was waiting for the images to be cleared before returning. Now that they have been provven acceptable, everything appears to meet FL standards. Giants2008 (17-14) 20:17, 27 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.