Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Manchester United F.C. players (25–99 appearances)/archive2
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was not promoted by Dabomb87 00:14, 21 August 2011 [1].
List of Manchester United F.C. players (25–99 appearances) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
- Nominator(s):
– HonorTheKing (talk), 03md, 01:06, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I am nominating this along with 03md, for featured list because it follows the same format as the two other Manchester United player lists which have been promoted to Featured List,
Please note Iv'e fixed all previous issues. (nationality case). Thank you.
– HonorTheKing (talk) 01:06, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from Giants2008 (27 and counting) 21:02, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comments –
|
- What makes MUFCInfo.com a reliable source?
- Even tho it is not an official ManUtd website, the website author Mark Graham is well known in the community for his accurate and reliable statistics, same as Bert Kassies is well known for his UEFA competitions statistics.
- Will leave this one unstruck in case other reviewers want to comment on it. Giants2008 (27 and counting) 23:04, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Ok
- Will leave this one unstruck in case other reviewers want to comment on it. Giants2008 (27 and counting) 23:04, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Even tho it is not an official ManUtd website, the website author Mark Graham is well known in the community for his accurate and reliable statistics, same as Bert Kassies is well known for his UEFA competitions statistics.
Giants2008 (27 and counting) 23:28, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Thank you for the comments, I have addressed some of the issues you referred to. If there is any issues please let me know.
– HonorTheKing (talk) 00:05, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Thank you for the comments, I have addressed some of the issues you referred to. If there is any issues please let me know.
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (talk) 20:32, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comments
The Rambling Man (talk) 20:01, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
|
- Thank you for the comments, Does any more reviewers maybe have more comments on improvments, or they feel it meets all of the FL criteria, it will be welcomed.
– HonorTheKing (talk) 23:20, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Please can I be credited if the nomination is successful, as the editor who put the list and prose together, and was involved in the previous nomination (which I still don't know why it didn't pass). 03md 01:32, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Ofcurse mate, Iv'e added you to one of the nominators.
– HonorTheKing (talk) 13:04, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Ofcurse mate, Iv'e added you to one of the nominators.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.