Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Music Bank Chart winners (2018)/archive1
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 24 June 2023 (UTC) [1].[reply]
List of Music Bank Chart winners (2018) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
- Nominator(s): EN-Jungwon (talk) and Jal11497 (talk) 07:45, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Another Music Bank winners list. This is the 6th FLC nomination from the Music Bank series. -- EN-Jungwon 07:45, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Comments
- "Laboum member Ahn Sol-bin" - link the group
- Done.
- "For the next four weeks after his departure, VIXX member N, Highlight member Son Dong-woon, Shinee member Taemin and BTS member Kim Seok-jin appeared as guest hosts alongside Solbin. On June 15, Lovelyz member Kei and actor Choi Won-myeong became the new hosts of the show." - sources for all of this?
- Done. I would like some help with the first sentence here. The current sentence makes it sound like the five people hosted the show for 4 weeks when that not the case. Each of them appeared alongside Solbin for 1 week (N hosted the show with Solbin on May 18, Son Dong-woon on May 25, Taemin on June 1 and Kim Seok-jin on June 8.) How can I mention this in the article. I couldn't think of any clean way to do it. -- EN-Jungwon 17:09, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- How about "For the next four weeks after his departure, VIXX member N, Highlight member Son Dong-woon, Shinee member Taemin and BTS member Kim Seok-jin each appeared on one show as a guest host alongside Solbin"....? -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 20:00, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Done. I would like some help with the first sentence here. The current sentence makes it sound like the five people hosted the show for 4 weeks when that not the case. Each of them appeared alongside Solbin for 1 week (N hosted the show with Solbin on May 18, Son Dong-woon on May 25, Taemin on June 1 and Kim Seok-jin on June 8.) How can I mention this in the article. I couldn't think of any clean way to do it. -- EN-Jungwon 17:09, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- "Three acts had three number one singles on the chart in 2018;" - semi-colon should be a colon
- Done.
- "Wanna One with "Boomerang", "Light" and "Spring Breeze"" => "and Wanna One with "Boomerang", "Light" and "Spring Breeze""
- Done.
- "Soloist Sunmi achieved her first number one on the chart with "Siren" on the September 21 broadcast. Infinite member Kim Sung-kyu won for the first time on Music Bank with "True Love" after it debut at number one on the March 9 broadcast." - sources?
- Done.
- Sources for the entire last paragraph of the lead? -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 15:57, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- @ChrisTheDude, all done. I have rewritten the last paragraph a little bit. -- EN-Jungwon 17:21, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Most of that last para is about acts having their first number one, but in the middle there's a bit about IKon that doesn't mention this. Was "Love Scenario" their first number one? If so, mention that. Also, I notice that their name is written with a capital I in the prose but a lower-case i in the table......? -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 06:39, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- @ChrisTheDude, "Love Scenario" is their first number one on Music Bank but I couldn't find any reliable source mentioning that. Should I move it to the second paragraph? -- EN-Jungwon 07:49, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Yes, it reads oddly having it in the middle of a section about "first number ones". It would fit in the second para, maybe after the bit about acts with three number ones.... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 12:59, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Done. I have also moved two sentences that mentions "first number one" from the second para to the third. -- EN-Jungwon 13:29, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Yes, it reads oddly having it in the middle of a section about "first number ones". It would fit in the second para, maybe after the bit about acts with three number ones.... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 12:59, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Most of that last para is about acts having their first number one, but in the middle there's a bit about IKon that doesn't mention this. Was "Love Scenario" their first number one? If so, mention that. Also, I notice that their name is written with a capital I in the prose but a lower-case i in the table......? -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 06:39, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 16:08, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Dank
[edit]- Standard disclaimer: I don't know what I'm doing, and I mostly AGF on sourcing.
- "Laboum member Ahn Sol-bin, who had been hosting the show since July 2016, continued to do so until June 8, 2018": I'm not sure what's going on here ... maybe this was first written in June 2018, and if so, then it sounded perfectly sensible back then. But IMO, 5 years later, the usual way to say this would be "Laboum member Ahn Sol-bin hosted the show from July 2016 until June 8, 2018." (For the next sentence, there's an argument that you need the extra words because of the clause that follows ... I don't have an opinion on that.) - Dank (push to talk) 15:19, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- "after it debut at number one": debuted?
- File:160919 INFINITE ONLY 쇼케이스 성규 2.jpg has a box that says "has not yet been reviewed".
- Most (or all) images need alt text of some kind.
- Checking the FLC criteria:
- 1. I've skimmed the prose; nothing big jumps out at me. I checked sorting on all sortable nonnumeric columns and sampled the links in the table.
- 2. The lead meets WP:LEAD and defines the inclusion criteria.
- 3a. The list has comprehensive items and annotations.
- 3b. The UPSD tool isn't indicating any actual problems (but this isn't a source review). None of the sources jump out at me as unreliable, but I can't read Korean. All relevant retrieval dates are present.
- 3c. The list meets requirements as a stand-alone list, it isn't a content fork, it doesn't largely duplicate another article (that I can find), and it wouldn't fit easily inside another article.
- 4. It is navigable.
- 5. It meets style requirements. At a glance, the images seem fine (except as above).
- 6. It is stable.
Close enough for aSupport. Well done. - Dank (push to talk) 17:21, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]- You might be interested in reviewing (when this link turns blue) WP:Featured list candidates/List of malvid families/archive1. - Dank (push to talk) 17:26, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- @Dank all done. I have added alt text to all the images and replaced the image with one of the artist in 2018. I would note the image was uploaded by an enwiki and commons admin so could we AGF and keep that image? Also, the source page for the image says that it is available under CC BY 4.0. Almost all the portrait images of the artist I found are unreviewed but they have acceptable licenses. The new image is also unreviewed at the moment. Should I ask an image reviewer on Commons to review it? -- EN-Jungwon 13:42, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- It wouldn't hurt. It doesn't change my support. - Dank (push to talk) 14:10, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- I looked at the new image and the source photo appears to have an appropriate free license, at least at the time it was reviewed on Commons. Giants2008 (Talk) 17:47, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- It wouldn't hurt. It doesn't change my support. - Dank (push to talk) 14:10, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- @Dank all done. I have added alt text to all the images and replaced the image with one of the artist in 2018. I would note the image was uploaded by an enwiki and commons admin so could we AGF and keep that image? Also, the source page for the image says that it is available under CC BY 4.0. Almost all the portrait images of the artist I found are unreviewed but they have acceptable licenses. The new image is also unreviewed at the moment. Should I ask an image reviewer on Commons to review it? -- EN-Jungwon 13:42, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Chompy Ace
[edit]Support: Great work! Also, If you have time would you care for reviewing the List of accolades received by Toy Story 3 regarding its featured list nomination? Chompy Ace 03:50, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Source review – The sources seem reliable enough from what I can tell (not knowing the Korean language), and the formatting looks okay. The link-checker tool shows no issues. Giants2008 (Talk) 21:22, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Promoting. --PresN 21:33, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.