Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of United States ODI cricketers/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by SchroCat 15:40, 4 June 2015 [1].
List of United States ODI cricketers (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
I am nominating this for featured list because it meets featured list criteria. I based the format of this article on List of Bermuda Twenty20 International cricketers which was just recently promoted. Blackhole78 talk | contrib 22:18, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from Cowlibob (talk) 01:49, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
*Image is missing alt text for accessibility.
Cowlibob (talk) 09:52, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply] Also, sorry about the late response. Real life work got in the way. |
Support Good work. Hope this nom gets more attention. Cowlibob (talk) 01:49, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from Littlecarmen (talk) 07:52, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comments from Littlecarmen
|
Support Nice work! I also nominated a list recently. It would be great if you could take a look at it and leave some comments here :) Littlecarmen (talk) 07:52, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Comments from Crisco
- Too many "2004"s in the lead.
- Thirteen players have represented U.S. in ODI matches, of whom nine have played both games. - I'd nix either the "have" in "have played" or change the "both" to two. If you're saying both, that implies there will be no further games, whereas "have played" suggests that there will / may be further games. Personally, I'd go with "Thirteen players have represented U.S. in ODI matches, of whom nine have played two games." since the rest of the paragraph is in the pluperfect.
- I'd probably have both sentences about Lambert be close together. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 07:01, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Good work. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:16, 19 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Just for clarification. Chris Woodrich=Crisco 1492. Cowlibob (talk) 05:52, 19 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Right, I changed my sig. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 12:07, 19 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Just for clarification. Chris Woodrich=Crisco 1492. Cowlibob (talk) 05:52, 19 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from Seattle (talk) 04:33, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comments
|
Resolved comments from —Vensatry (ping) |
---|
Comments from —Vensatry (ping)
|
- Support – Good work! —Vensatry (ping) 14:06, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Support I've made a couple of minor tweaks to the lead, but all in all a good list, well done. Harrias talk 13:05, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.