Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of accolades received by Lagaan/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was not promoted by Hahc21 10:03, 25 March 2013 (UTC) [1].[reply]
List of accolades received by Lagaan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Featured list candidates/List of accolades received by Lagaan/archive1
- Featured list candidates/List of accolades received by Lagaan/archive2
| Toolbox |
|---|
- Nominator(s): Surge_Elec (talk) 07:15, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I am nominating this list for featured list because I feel that I have significantly improved the quality and it meets all 6 FL criteria. Surge_Elec (talk) 07:15, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose
- Four paragraphs for an article of this size is too much
- The prose is not so engaging. For eg., "Lagaan dominated Indian film award ceremonies, earning various nominations and winning numerous awards, including Best Film and Best Director, in each." The sentence is non-neutral and needs to be verifiable. The film did not win "Best Film" and "Best Director" awards at the National Film Awards.
- The "Recipients and nominees" column lists not just the recipients, but also the work
- Nobody would be interested in "Date of ceremony". Rather you could mention the order of the ceremony
- References are incomplete and some are non-reliable (IMDb, Apunkachoice.com, to name a few)
- All in all, this list needs copy-editing and reference formatting. Consider taking the article to PR before bringing it here for the second time
- All in all, this list needs copy-editing and reference formatting. Consider taking the article to PR before bringing it here for the second time
—Vensatry (Ping me) 12:22, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - suggest the nominator follows Vensatry's advice. At a glance I can see several MOS issues (e.g. WP:CONTEXTLINK, WP:HASH, MOS:REF, WP:DASH), grammar issues (e.g. "in Time magazines' list"), not to mention those issues raised above. It's a good framework for an FLC, but it needs a thorough copyedit. The Rambling Man (talk) 10:19, 21 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.