Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of international cricket five-wicket hauls by Shakib Al Hasan/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by Giants2008 via FACBot (talk) 01:43, 18 January 2016 (UTC) [1].[reply]
List of international cricket five-wicket hauls by Shakib Al Hasan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Featured list candidates/List of international cricket five-wicket hauls by Shakib Al Hasan/archive1
Toolbox |
---|
- Nominator(s):Aftabuzzaman, —Vensatry (Talk) 18:24, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
My first fifers-list (of a player's) in a long time. Aftabuzzaman created the basic article. I expanded the lead and tidied up the table a bit. —Vensatry (Talk) 18:24, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from NapHit (talk) 14:27, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comments
NapHit (talk) 09:39, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
|
- Support Great work. NapHit (talk) 14:27, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (talk) 08:13, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comments
The Rambling Man (talk) 20:00, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
|
- Support my concerns addressed. The Rambling Man (talk) 08:13, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
- "With 15 five-wicket hauls across all formats of the game" => "With 15 five-wicket hauls across all formats of international cricket", as currently it implies that these are the only fifers he's ever taken in any cricket match at all
- "He ended the year with three more five-wicket hauls—coming in consecutive innings—against South Africa and Sri Lanka." => "He ended the year with three more five-wicket hauls, which came in consecutive innings against South Africa and Sri Lanka."
- "ODI" is introduced in the final paragraph of the lead but it has not been mentioned before and the abbreviation is not explained or linked. It should probably be written out in full here, although obviously it is OK to then use the abbreviation in the next sentence.
- "He took five wickets for 47 runs in the match which his team won by 145 runs" => "He took five wickets for 47 runs in the match, which his team won by 145 runs" - a bit picky but there you go ;-)
- That's all I can spot -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:58, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@ChrisTheDude: Fixed all, thanks for the comments. As for the last comment, I have problems with comma splice :). —Vensatry (Talk) 08:58, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Support - all looks good now == ChrisTheDude (talk) 09:45, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from Relentlessly (talk) 15:24, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comments from Relentlessly
In general this looks good. One or two small things:
I've also taken a good look through the sources and the sourcing looks excellent. It's a pity that such a vast majority of links are to one website, but I understand that Cricinfo is canonical. On a broader subject, I do wonder if a little more context to Shakib's career could be offered. He's been described as "Bangladesh’s greatest-ever cricketer" ([2]) and has been ranked as the top all-rounder in every form of international cricket ([3]). These feel relevant to a description of him as a cricketer, although I recognise that they aren't specifically relevant to five-wicket hauls. Relentlessly (talk) 10:47, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
|
Support. Relentlessly (talk) 15:24, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Giants2008 (Talk) 22:07, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.