Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of tied One Day Internationals/archive1
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by Crisco 1492 00:53, 26 August 2015 [1].
List of tied One Day Internationals (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
- Nominator(s): —Vensatry (ping) 18:10, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
A decade-old list, I've completely re-written the lead and worked on the table and formatting stuff. Look forward to comments and suggestions, as always —Vensatry (ping) 18:10, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (talk) 07:42, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comments
That's it from a quick run-through. The Rambling Man (talk) 08:36, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
|
- Support looks good to me. The Rambling Man (talk) 07:42, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Comments from West Virginian
- Vensatry, I only had a few comments for you regarding this list. Overall, fantastic job researching and crafting this lede and list! -- West Virginian (talk) 04:40, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- The first statement in the first sentence of the lede where the term "One Day International" is defined should have an inline citation at the end of it.
- The image of the Australian team is licensed CC BY-SA 2.0 and is acceptable for use here. Both captions are suitable.
- Over (cricket) should be wiki-linked to the "over" in 40-over, since it comes before the next usage of the term in the lede's prose.
- In the last sentence of the first paragraph, two matches are mentioned but no specifics are given. Is there a way to include more information here regarding those two matches? I know this content is below in the table, but this could be elaborated further in this sentence.
- Bangladesh needn't be wiki-linked in the final sentence of the lede.
- All the images included are licensed appropriately and are suitable for use here; and all images have acceptable captions in keeping with FL standards.
- @West Virginian: Thanks for your review. Hopefully, I've addressed all of them. —Vensatry (ping) 07:37, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Support: Vensatry, congratulations on a job well done! -- West Virginian (talk) 11:06, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Fine work on the list. — Ssven2 Speak 2 me 14:24, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from NapHit (talk) 12:38, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comments'
Other than these looks good. NapHit (talk) 19:57, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
|
- Support Great work. NapHit (talk) 12:38, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:36, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.