Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Shooting thaler/archive2
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by Dabomb87 22:38, 19 January 2011 [1].
Shooting thaler (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
- Nominator(s): RHM22 (talk) 04:14, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I am nominating this for featured list because I feel that it meets the criteria and covers the subject of shooting thalers thoroughly. This article was previously nominated, but I asked that it be withdrawn temporarily so some changes could be made to the format. The changes are discussed in detail on the talk page, but to sum it up, the lists were made more accessible for non-sighted users who must use programs to read aloud what is written on the page.-RHM22 (talk) 04:14, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Support like I did before. But now it's much better!-- ♫Greatorangepumpkin♫ T 17:20, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Thank you!-RHM22 (talk) 18:44, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (talk) 19:35, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comments - welcome back!
The Rambling Man (talk) 18:13, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
|
- Support great. And double-great you took some good advice from JohnFromPinckney (along with a few assists!) and came back with an even better list than the one you first nominated. Excellent. The Rambling Man (talk) 19:35, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Thank you! The assistance and suggestions receieved from JohnFromPinckney cannot be overstated. His excellent suggestions have signifigantly improved the article.-RHM22 (talk) 04:04, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comments Support –
In the history section, I see mentions of "legal fineness" and "legal finess". Are these correct, or is there a typo in one of them?The bibliography should be in alphabetical order, by author.Giants2008 (27 and counting) 22:32, 15 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks for the nice catches! It looks like I could use more "finesse" in my spelling! They should both be "fineness". I never knew that about the bibliography. Both have now been fixed.-RHM22 (talk) 01:54, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.