Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Veronica Mars (season 3)/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by Matthewedwards 20:37, 21 April 2009 [1].
- Nominator(s): Corn.u.co.pia • Disc.us.sion
I am nominating this for featured list because I feel it meets the current criteria. Please note that although this is currently a good article, I have reformatted it to become a featured list. Corn.u.co.pia • Disc.us.sion 07:39, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Is it possible (for Article History purposes) to have this as a GA and FL at the same time? I think you should get this delisted first. Dabomb87 (talk) 12:51, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I wasn't too sure about this, so I just nominated the article. I have inquired for this article to be delisted at GA, so hopefully there is no issue here (at FLC). Corn.u.co.pia • Disc.us.sion 13:21, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The article has now been delisted from GA, so there should be no problem. Dabomb87 (talk) 22:06, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from Truco
|
---|
Thanks for the review. I have fixed all issues except for those I have replied to above. :) Corn.u.co.pia • Disc.us.sion 10:21, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
|
- Support -- Previous issues resolved to meet WP:WIAFL; great work.--Truco 15:35, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from 97198
|
---|
Otherwise, everything looks pretty good. Nice work :) —97198 (talk) 06:48, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
|
- Support Changes look good, well done. —97198 (talk) 07:12, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support, all issues resolved. Dabomb87 (talk) 14:02, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved issues, Dabomb87 (talk) |
---|
Comments from Dabomb87 (talk · contribs)
|
Sources look good. Dabomb87 (talk) 14:02, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
What makes http://www.aintitcool.com/node/31898 reliable?Dabomb87 (talk) 22:13, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]- Despite the ref's title, it is only used to cite that the site's writer ranked the season on his end of year best-list. A review isn't controversial information, so I'm thinking it should be allowed. Corn.u.co.pia • Disc.us.sion 08:42, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Support, nice work! —TheLeftorium 14:19, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Thank you! :) Corn.u.co.pia • Disc.us.sion 05:41, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I have mentioned this FLC in a post here. Please note that my proposed change would not affect the status of this FLC in any way (or the status of any current FLs that are former GAs). -- Scorpion0422 20:15, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.