Wikipedia:Featured list removal candidates/List of Portuguese monarchs/archive3
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list removal nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was removed by IMatthew 21:11, 29 August 2009 [1].
| Toolbox |
|---|
- Notified: User:The Ogre, WikiProject Portugal, WikiProject Politics
The main reason for this nomination is the lack of inline citations to make sure the content is true. I don't know what book, from the four listed in the references, I need to use to verify. We need citations to easily verify any info we want. Currently, this page fails a basic requirement for a Wikipedia article. It also fails several criteria of WP:WIAFL:
- Criterion 2: Lead The lead defines the inclusion criteria, but not the scope of the page. The lead doesn't talk about what monarchs are for, what monarchs have done to their country. The lead needs at least one paragraph about monarchs. The bulleted part should not be included in the lead.
- Criterion 3: Comprehensiveness
- 3a The lead mentions that the list includes monarchs from 1139, yet I see the monarch of 868 is listed. What happened between 1015 and 1017? What was the title of Nuno II Mendes before 1065? What happened to the reign dates of João VI?
- Criterion 4: Structure Table sorting may be needed
- Criterion 5: Style Colors are usually used as indicators, but in this case, colors in all but the last two tables do not indicate anything. In the House of Aviz, or Joannine Dynasty section, there's a notes column that is unnecessary.
There are also several dablinks and the images need alt text.--Crzycheetah 05:09, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist Pity, as this list is quite interesting and not in too bad a shape. Each criterion issue is not a problem by itself, but as a whole, the list no longer meets WP:WIAFL. Dabomb87 (talk) 00:35, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.