Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Aeroflot Tupolev Tu-104B at Arlanda, July 1972

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 30 Sep 2011 at 13:19:57 (UTC)

Reason: This photo never fails to amaze me everytime I look at it. For a photo which is now nearly 40 years old, the quality is absolutely AMAZING! It has often been said that it looks like a computer generated image, but low and behold, it is absolutely real, and is quite probably the most amazing photo of this vintage Soviet aircraft that I have seen
Articles in which this image appears: Tupolev Tu-104, Aeroflot, User:Russavia/SU fleet (a future article on the history of the Aeroflot fleet)
FP category for this image: link to category from WP:FP that best describes the image (check categories first)
Creator: Lars Söderström

Support as nominator --Russavia ^{Let's dialogue} 13:19, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support, high EV-- Someone35 16:06, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Мурад 97 (talk) 23:37, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Not much more to add to this discussion. High resolution, plane is centered. A blown highlight on the nose, but I don't think it's that bad. Crisco 1492 (talk) 01:20, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Tail is clipped, background is too busy, distracting and unappealing with that ugly dome thing, as well as that poorly placed light-post looking like a giant aerial in thumb. --jjron (talk) 13:49, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose -- As above, especially on the clipped wing and tight crop. Alvesgaspar (talk) 18:20, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Poor lighting, blown highlights, bad framing. JFitch (talk) 22:23, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Cropped tail, poor lighting and too many distracting details - for example, the numerous marks on the plain body and on the ground in front. Maybe this all (except for tail) can be tweaked by editing, but I would rather reshoot. Materialscientist (talk) 10:31, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Makeemlighter (talk) 09:54, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]