Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/American bison k5680-1.jpg

American Bison

Other than the graininess and the hooves being hidden, I think this is an excellent picture of an American bison, showing both a frontal view of the head and a side view of the body; appears in Bison, American Bison, and Bovid (all about the same thing), and the USDA created the image, with an upload by QuartierLatin1968/QuartierLatin1968.

Please note. This is not the only version. There is also an exact copy located here. The alternate version is located in several different articles in different langauges, so a speedy delete would be difficult at this time (it would need to be replaced in each article). I chose to nominate the version that was already a FP in Wikimedia Commons.

Nominate and support original. The edit is oversaturated. - Tewy 02:57, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good colors, nice composition. -Ravedave 04:02, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Support edit 1. The color is *much* better. A nice job as usual Fir. -Ravedave 01:09, 13 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support despite the fact that the grass makes it somewhat busy I like the composition and I like the shot layout, it is definitely a well done photo and has the wow factor, it also shows the bison well. Jtkiefer^{T | C | @} ---- 10:10, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Edit 1 I like it, and it is mostly in focus from front to back. I like the new edit, nothing seems overexposed that was not before. HighInBC 15:59, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice shot, looks well-enoughed focused for me. InvictaHOG 17:24, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
SupportNnfolz 20:53, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support - bizzarrely, I was looking at bison like 3 days and thinking it was a pity there wasn't a decent image there. Either I missed this, or it's been added since. Stevage 22:16, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support original, oppose edit. Sorry but like the waterfall this edit is over the top again. Way oversaturated. --Dschwen 00:12, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support good detail and color. Better than the two I just uploaded to the American Bison article IMHO.--MONGO 08:17, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very natural, great colour contrast. King fish erswift 10:43, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support. - Mailer Diablo 18:09, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support Either with preference for Edit 1. Very nice. --Fir0002 00:47, 13 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support - per above. --GoOdCoNtEnT 18:19, 13 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support edit 1. Per Jtkiefer. --Pharaoh Hound (talk) 18:38, 13 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support original, oppose edit. ~~Fir's~~ Everyone's colorspace must be way different from mine, because I just see artificial saturation. Outriggr 21:38, 13 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Darwinek 23:03, 13 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support Edit 1 - good picture, meets all criteria. --GoOdCoNtEnT 02:58, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support original. Maybe slightly lacking contrast, but not disturbingly. Oppose edit, too saturated.--JyriL ^talk 15:05, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support original. -- Looks fine on my monitor; Fir's looks a bit oversaturated. -- Moondigger 23:23, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support either. howch e ng {chat} 20:47, 15 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support edit 2 fine image--Vircabutar 01:00, 17 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support edit 1 good image--Neo139 15:55, 19 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted Image:American bison k5680-1.jpg It appears there's more support for/less opposition to the original. -- Moondigger 01:36, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]